Make a forward declaration of RCTMethodInfo

[iegik]

declares an anonymous structure and creates a typedef for it. Thus, with this construct, it doesn't have a name in the tag namespace, only a name in the typedef namespace. This means it also cannot be forward-declared. If you want to make a forward declaration, you have to give it a name in the tag namespace.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/612328/difference-between-struct-and-typedef-struct-in-c

(Write your motivation here.)

Test Plan

(Write your test plan here. If you changed any code, please provide us with clear instructions on how you verified your changes work. Bonus points for screenshots and videos!)

[pull-bot]

Attention: @shergin

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS

[hramos]

As with the others, this PR needs a test plan.

[shergin]

So, why do we need this? Any real benefits?

[iegik]

I have no idea. Please, read carefully Stackoverflow answer. If somebody see the difference - you can apply PR, otherwise - close it w/o merge. Thanks.

[facebook-github-bot]

@iegik I tried to find reviewers for this pull request and wanted to ping them to take another look. However, based on the blame information for the files in this pull request I couldn't find any reviewers. This sometimes happens when the files in the pull request are new or don't exist on master anymore. Is this pull request still relevant? If yes could you please rebase? In case you know who has context on this code feel free to mention them in a comment (one person is fine). Thanks for reading and hope you will continue contributing to the project.

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Maybe the issue has been fixed in a recent release, or perhaps it is not affecting a lot of people. If you think this issue should definitely remain open, please let us know why. Thank you for your contributions.