Add example on how to use union types on TM #36927
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Summary: This change is an alternative to show how to use union types in TM **without generating union types** natively. The goal is to enable using unions in the JS layer, without compromising the Native typesafety. If this approach is a good middle-ground, we can remove the MixedTypeAnnotation and migrate to this approach. ## Changelog: [General][Added] - Add example on Union types for Turbomodules Differential Revision: D45045552 fbshipit-source-id: 101e7036d83485e3b31802c2156d1e6dd6af9a64
facebook-github-bot
added
CLA Signed
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D45045552 |
Base commit: 2b4e1f5 |
|
Closing as abandoned internally |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
This change is an alternative to show how to use union types in TM without generating union types natively.
The goal is to enable using unions in the JS layer, without compromising the Native typesafety.
If this approach is a good middle-ground, we can remove the MixedTypeAnnotation and migrate to this approach.
Changelog:
[General][Added] - Add example on Union types for Turbomodules
Differential Revision: D45045552