-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed various memory leaks and Java 8 JNI Compatibility #1890
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ructing objects in portal.h
…ultiplierAdditional
…bWBWIRocksIterator#entry1
…d not free the underlying heap Slice(s)
…ter instances on the heap
@siying has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
Is the Java test failure in Travis related? |
@siying I do not think so, I have restarted the job to see. The top of the stack looks like:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have manually audited the entire RocksJava code base.
Sorry for the large pull-request, I have broken it down into many small atomic commits though.
My initial intention was to fix the warnings that appear when running RocksJava on Java 8 with
-Xcheck:jni
, for example when runningmake jtest
you would see many errors similar to:A few of those warnings still remain, however they seem to come directly from the JVM and are not directly related to RocksJava; I am in contact with the OpenJDK hostpot-dev mailing list about these - http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-February/025981.html.
As a result of fixing these, I realised we were not really doing any error checking around our JNI calls, which in an unexpected error case could easily put RocksJava into an unknown state and leak memory. I correct this with extensive error checking through the code base.
Along the way I think I found several (11) memory leaks in RocksJava; I believe I have now fixed all of these, the most serious was in
org.rocksdb.WBWIRocksIterator#entry
.