Two performance improvements in BlockBuilder #9039
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Summary: Primarily, this change reserves space in the std::string for building the next block once a block is finished, using `block_size` as reservation size. Note: also tried reusing same std::string in the common "unbuffered" path but that showed no benefit or regression. Secondarily, this slightly reduces the work in resetting `restarts_`. Test Plan: TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/rocksdb1 ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -memtablerep=vector -duration=60 -allow_concurrent_memtable_write=false -num=50000000 Compiled with DEBUG_LEVEL=0 Test vs. control runs simulaneous for better accuracy, units = ops/sec Run 1, Primary change only: 292697 vs. 280267 (+4.4%) Run 2, Primary change only: 288763 vs. 279621 (+3.3%) Run 1, Secondary change only: 260065 vs. 254232 (+2.3%) Run 2, Secondary change only: 275925 vs. 272248 (+1.4%) Run 1, Both changes: 284890 vs. 270372 (+5.3%) Run 2, Both changes: 263511 vs. 258188 (+2.0%)
|
@pdillinger has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
pdillinger
added a commit
to pdillinger/rocksdb
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 15, 2021
Summary: ... by bypassing tracking of last_key in BlockBuilder when last_key is already known (for BlockBasedTableBuilder::data_block). I tried extracting a base class of BlockBuilder without the last_key tracking at all, but that became complicated by NewFlushBlockPolicy() in the public API referencing BlockBuilder, which would need to be the base class, and I don't want to replace nearly all the internal references to BlockBuilder. This improvement should stack with facebook#9039 Test Plan: TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/rocksdb1 ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -memtablerep=vector -allow_concurrent_memtable_write=false -num=50000000 Compiled with DEBUG_LEVEL=0 Test vs. control runs simulaneous for better accuracy, units = ops/sec Run 1: 278929 vs. 267799 (+4.2%) Run 2: 281836 vs. 267432 (+5.4%) Run 3: 278279 vs. 270454 (+2.9%) (This benchmark is chosen to have detectable signal-to-noise, not to represent expected improvement percent on real workloads.)
|
@pdillinger merged this pull request in 9d66d6d. |
facebook-github-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2021
Summary: ... by bypassing tracking of last_key in BlockBuilder when last_key is already known (for BlockBasedTableBuilder::data_block). I tried extracting a base class of BlockBuilder without the last_key tracking at all, but that became complicated by NewFlushBlockPolicy() in the public API referencing BlockBuilder, which would need to be the base class, and I don't want to replace nearly all the internal references to BlockBuilder. Possible follow-up: * Investigate / consider using AddWithLastKey in more places This improvement should stack with #9039 Pull Request resolved: #9040 Test Plan: TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/rocksdb1 ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -memtablerep=vector -allow_concurrent_memtable_write=false -num=50000000 Compiled with DEBUG_LEVEL=0 Test vs. control runs simulaneous for better accuracy, units = ops/sec Run 1: 278929 vs. 267799 (+4.2%) Run 2: 281836 vs. 267432 (+5.4%) Run 3: 278279 vs. 270454 (+2.9%) (This benchmark is chosen to have detectable signal-to-noise, not to represent expected improvement percent on real workloads.) Reviewed By: mrambacher Differential Revision: D31706033 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: 8a50fe6fefdd67b6d7665ffa687bbdcf5ad0d5ec
yoori
pushed a commit
to yoori/rocksdb
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2023
Summary: Primarily, this change reserves space in the std::string for building the next block once a block is finished, using `block_size` as reservation size. Note: also tried reusing same std::string in the common "unbuffered" path but that showed no benefit or regression. Secondarily, this slightly reduces the work in resetting `restarts_`. Pull Request resolved: facebook/rocksdb#9039 Test Plan: TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/rocksdb1 ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -memtablerep=vector -allow_concurrent_memtable_write=false -num=50000000 Compiled with DEBUG_LEVEL=0 Test vs. control runs simulaneous for better accuracy, units = ops/sec Run 1, Primary change only: 292697 vs. 280267 (+4.4%) Run 2, Primary change only: 288763 vs. 279621 (+3.3%) Run 1, Secondary change only: 260065 vs. 254232 (+2.3%) Run 2, Secondary change only: 275925 vs. 272248 (+1.4%) Run 1, Both changes: 284890 vs. 270372 (+5.3%) Run 2, Both changes: 263511 vs. 258188 (+2.0%) Reviewed By: zhichao-cao Differential Revision: D31701253 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: 7e40810afbb98e6b6446955e77bda59e69b19ffd
yoori
pushed a commit
to yoori/rocksdb
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2023
Summary: ... by bypassing tracking of last_key in BlockBuilder when last_key is already known (for BlockBasedTableBuilder::data_block). I tried extracting a base class of BlockBuilder without the last_key tracking at all, but that became complicated by NewFlushBlockPolicy() in the public API referencing BlockBuilder, which would need to be the base class, and I don't want to replace nearly all the internal references to BlockBuilder. Possible follow-up: * Investigate / consider using AddWithLastKey in more places This improvement should stack with facebook/rocksdb#9039 Pull Request resolved: facebook/rocksdb#9040 Test Plan: TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/rocksdb1 ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -memtablerep=vector -allow_concurrent_memtable_write=false -num=50000000 Compiled with DEBUG_LEVEL=0 Test vs. control runs simulaneous for better accuracy, units = ops/sec Run 1: 278929 vs. 267799 (+4.2%) Run 2: 281836 vs. 267432 (+5.4%) Run 3: 278279 vs. 270454 (+2.9%) (This benchmark is chosen to have detectable signal-to-noise, not to represent expected improvement percent on real workloads.) Reviewed By: mrambacher Differential Revision: D31706033 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: 8a50fe6fefdd67b6d7665ffa687bbdcf5ad0d5ec
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
Primarily, this change reserves space in the std::string for building
the next block once a block is finished, using
block_sizeasreservation size. Note: also tried reusing same std::string in the
common "unbuffered" path but that showed no benefit or regression.
Secondarily, this slightly reduces the work in resetting
restarts_.Test Plan: TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/rocksdb1 ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -memtablerep=vector -allow_concurrent_memtable_write=false -num=50000000
Compiled with DEBUG_LEVEL=0
Test vs. control runs simulaneous for better accuracy, units = ops/sec
Run 1, Primary change only: 292697 vs. 280267 (+4.4%)
Run 2, Primary change only: 288763 vs. 279621 (+3.3%)
Run 1, Secondary change only: 260065 vs. 254232 (+2.3%)
Run 2, Secondary change only: 275925 vs. 272248 (+1.4%)
Run 1, Both changes: 284890 vs. 270372 (+5.3%)
Run 2, Both changes: 263511 vs. 258188 (+2.0%)
(This benchmark is chosen to have detectable signal-to-noise, not to
represent expected improvement percent on real workloads.)