-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handle failures in block-based table size/offset approximation #9615
Conversation
@ajkr has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Wow, good catch. How did we discover it? |
Thanks for the review!
Thanks. We got a couple crash test failure tasks already for It was nearly impossible to repro before understanding the bug because it can only happen in a very specific setup. Fault injection for It turns out there is one case when we do inject faults in the background. That is, when |
Summary: In crash test with fault injection, we were seeing stack traces like the following: ``` #3 0x00007f75f763c533 in __GI___assert_fail (assertion=assertion@entry=0x1c5b2a0 "end_offset >= start_offset", file=file@entry=0x1c580a0 "table/block_based/block_based_table_reader.cc", line=line@entry=3245, function=function@entry=0x1c60e60 "virtual uint64_t rocksdb::BlockBasedTable::ApproximateSize(const rocksdb::Slice&, const rocksdb::Slice&, rocksdb::TableReaderCaller)") at assert.c:101 #4 0x00000000010ea9b4 in rocksdb::BlockBasedTable::ApproximateSize (this=<optimized out>, start=..., end=..., caller=<optimized out>) at table/block_based/block_based_table_reader.cc:3224 #5 0x0000000000be61fb in rocksdb::TableCache::ApproximateSize (this=0x60f0000161b0, start=..., end=..., fd=..., caller=caller@entry=rocksdb::kCompaction, internal_comparator=..., prefix_extractor=...) at db/table_cache.cc:719 #6 0x0000000000c3eaec in rocksdb::VersionSet::ApproximateSize (this=<optimized out>, v=<optimized out>, f=..., start=..., end=..., caller=<optimized out>) at ./db/version_set.h:850 #7 0x0000000000c6ebc3 in rocksdb::VersionSet::ApproximateSize (this=<optimized out>, options=..., v=v@entry=0x621000047500, start=..., end=..., start_level=start_level@entry=0, end_level=<optimized out>, caller=<optimized out>) at db/version_set.cc:5657 #8 0x000000000166e894 in rocksdb::CompactionJob::GenSubcompactionBoundaries (this=<optimized out>) at ./include/rocksdb/options.h:1869 #9 0x000000000168c526 in rocksdb::CompactionJob::Prepare (this=this@entry=0x7f75f3ffcf00) at db/compaction/compaction_job.cc:546 ``` The problem occurred in `ApproximateSize()` when the index `Seek()` for the first `ApproximateDataOffsetOf()` encountered an I/O error, while the second `Seek()` did not. In the old code that scenario caused `start_offset == data_size` , thus it was easy to trip the assertion that `end_offset >= start_offset`. The fix is to set `start_offset == 0` when the first index `Seek()` fails, and `end_offset == data_size` when the second index `Seek()` fails. I doubt these give an "on average correct" answer for how this function is used, but I/O errors in index seeks are hopefully rare, it looked consistent with what was already there, and it was easier to calculate. Pull Request resolved: #9615 Test Plan: run the repro command for a while and stopped seeing coredumps - ``` $ while ! ./db_stress --block_size=128 --cache_size=32768 --clear_column_family_one_in=0 --column_families=1 --continuous_verification_interval=0 --db=/dev/shm/rocksdb_crashtest --delpercent=4 --delrangepercent=1 --destroy_db_initially=0 --expected_values_dir=/dev/shm/rocksdb_crashtest_expected --index_type=2 --iterpercent=10 --kill_random_test=18887 --max_key=1000000 --max_bytes_for_level_base=2048576 --nooverwritepercent=1 --open_files=-1 --open_read_fault_one_in=32 --ops_per_thread=1000000 --prefixpercent=5 --read_fault_one_in=0 --readpercent=45 --reopen=0 --skip_verifydb=1 --subcompactions=2 --target_file_size_base=524288 --test_batches_snapshots=0 --value_size_mult=32 --write_buffer_size=524288 --writepercent=35 ; do : ; done ``` Reviewed By: pdillinger Differential Revision: D34383069 Pulled By: ajkr fbshipit-source-id: fac26c3b20ea962e75387515ba5f2724dc48719f
Summary: In crash test with fault injection, we were seeing stack traces like the following: ``` #3 0x00007f75f763c533 in __GI___assert_fail (assertion=assertion@entry=0x1c5b2a0 "end_offset >= start_offset", file=file@entry=0x1c580a0 "table/block_based/block_based_table_reader.cc", line=line@entry=3245, function=function@entry=0x1c60e60 "virtual uint64_t rocksdb::BlockBasedTable::ApproximateSize(const rocksdb::Slice&, const rocksdb::Slice&, rocksdb::TableReaderCaller)") at assert.c:101 #4 0x00000000010ea9b4 in rocksdb::BlockBasedTable::ApproximateSize (this=<optimized out>, start=..., end=..., caller=<optimized out>) at table/block_based/block_based_table_reader.cc:3224 #5 0x0000000000be61fb in rocksdb::TableCache::ApproximateSize (this=0x60f0000161b0, start=..., end=..., fd=..., caller=caller@entry=rocksdb::kCompaction, internal_comparator=..., prefix_extractor=...) at db/table_cache.cc:719 #6 0x0000000000c3eaec in rocksdb::VersionSet::ApproximateSize (this=<optimized out>, v=<optimized out>, f=..., start=..., end=..., caller=<optimized out>) at ./db/version_set.h:850 #7 0x0000000000c6ebc3 in rocksdb::VersionSet::ApproximateSize (this=<optimized out>, options=..., v=v@entry=0x621000047500, start=..., end=..., start_level=start_level@entry=0, end_level=<optimized out>, caller=<optimized out>) at db/version_set.cc:5657 #8 0x000000000166e894 in rocksdb::CompactionJob::GenSubcompactionBoundaries (this=<optimized out>) at ./include/rocksdb/options.h:1869 #9 0x000000000168c526 in rocksdb::CompactionJob::Prepare (this=this@entry=0x7f75f3ffcf00) at db/compaction/compaction_job.cc:546 ``` The problem occurred in `ApproximateSize()` when the index `Seek()` for the first `ApproximateDataOffsetOf()` encountered an I/O error, while the second `Seek()` did not. In the old code that scenario caused `start_offset == data_size` , thus it was easy to trip the assertion that `end_offset >= start_offset`. The fix is to set `start_offset == 0` when the first index `Seek()` fails, and `end_offset == data_size` when the second index `Seek()` fails. I doubt these give an "on average correct" answer for how this function is used, but I/O errors in index seeks are hopefully rare, it looked consistent with what was already there, and it was easier to calculate. Pull Request resolved: #9615 Test Plan: run the repro command for a while and stopped seeing coredumps - ``` $ while ! ./db_stress --block_size=128 --cache_size=32768 --clear_column_family_one_in=0 --column_families=1 --continuous_verification_interval=0 --db=/dev/shm/rocksdb_crashtest --delpercent=4 --delrangepercent=1 --destroy_db_initially=0 --expected_values_dir=/dev/shm/rocksdb_crashtest_expected --index_type=2 --iterpercent=10 --kill_random_test=18887 --max_key=1000000 --max_bytes_for_level_base=2048576 --nooverwritepercent=1 --open_files=-1 --open_read_fault_one_in=32 --ops_per_thread=1000000 --prefixpercent=5 --read_fault_one_in=0 --readpercent=45 --reopen=0 --skip_verifydb=1 --subcompactions=2 --target_file_size_base=524288 --test_batches_snapshots=0 --value_size_mult=32 --write_buffer_size=524288 --writepercent=35 ; do : ; done ``` Reviewed By: pdillinger Differential Revision: D34383069 Pulled By: ajkr fbshipit-source-id: fac26c3b20ea962e75387515ba5f2724dc48719f
In crash test with fault injection, we were seeing stack traces like the following:
The problem occurred in
ApproximateSize()
when the indexSeek()
for the firstApproximateDataOffsetOf()
encountered an I/O error, while the secondSeek()
did not. In the old code that scenario causedstart_offset == data_size
, thus it was easy to trip the assertion thatend_offset >= start_offset
.The fix is to set
start_offset == 0
when the first indexSeek()
fails, andend_offset == data_size
when the second indexSeek()
fails. I doubt these give an "on average correct" answer for how this function is used, but I/O errors in index seeks are hopefully rare, it looked consistent with what was already there, and it was easier to calculate.Test Plan: run the repro command for a while and stopped seeing coredumps -