Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Better check of type before converting vector to quaternion #1896

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2022
Merged

Better check of type before converting vector to quaternion #1896

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2022

Conversation

vincentpierre
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation and Context

reimplementation of #1887

How Has This Been Tested

Types of changes

  • Docs change / refactoring / dependency upgrade
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have completed my CLA (see CONTRIBUTING)
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@vincentpierre vincentpierre self-assigned this Oct 7, 2022
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. label Oct 7, 2022
@vincentpierre vincentpierre merged commit 365667e into main Oct 7, 2022
@jturner65 jturner65 deleted the check_qt branch November 29, 2023 15:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Skylion007 Skylion007 Skylion007 approved these changes

Assignees

@vincentpierre vincentpierre

Labels
CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@vincentpierre @Skylion007 @facebook-github-bot