Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

--PBR/IBL Configuration and customization #2155

Merged
merged 61 commits into from
Aug 4, 2023
Merged

--PBR/IBL Configuration and customization #2155

merged 61 commits into from
Aug 4, 2023

Conversation

jturner65
Copy link
Contributor

@jturner65 jturner65 commented Jul 11, 2023

Motivation and Context

This PR facilitates the consumption of image-based lighting in PBR-rendered objects and scenes, as well as introducing many customization capabilities for the PBR/IBL shader. These customizations are enabled through the use of a JSON configuration file, using the extension ".pbr_config.json", a default template of which is included in the PR. Among the customizations exposed in this PR are :

  • The ability to set a direct lighting level value, so that PBR and Phong results can be more easily balanced without modifying lights.
  • Specifying BRDF lookup table and Environment Map assets to use for image-based lighting beyond those baked into the resources file.
  • Enable/disable direct lighting and/or image-based lighting.
  • Enable/disable tonemapping on the direct lighting and/or image-based lighting results
  • Enable/disable approximate remapping from sRGB<->linear color spaces for textures that are specified to be sRGB in GLTF standard (basecolor texture, emissive texture, specular color texture), so that all calculations can be performed on linear color data.
  • Modify (TODO : or disable) the shader-based calculation that enables the consumption of normal textures when precomputed tangents are not provided by computing a TBN frame. (Note : without this calculation, no normal textures will be consumed if no precomputed tangents are present, and the visuals will suffer substantially).
  • Enable/disable specific KHR extension layers (clear coat, specular layer, anisotropy) to see any potential impact on performance.
  • Specify the level of direct and indirect specular and diffuse contributions in the final rendered color.
  • Specify tonemap exposure and sRGB remapping gamma values.

A DrawableConfiguration class is also added to serve as the carrier for the various values required by the drawables, including values that are used by one type (i.e. Phong) but not the other (i.e. PBR). This will also make adding, for example, skindata support to the PBR drawables more easily accomplished in the future.

Tests and Python bindings are also a part of this PR for both the PbrShaderAttributes and the PbrShaderAttributesManager. Documentation modifications/additions still WIP.

NOTE : To support some resource functionality requirements, the Corrade package was updated.

Here's a brief overview of how the new PBR/IBL shader support is accomplished :

The metadata setup

The config file format seen here describes the editable configuration values for the PBR shader, including IBL assets and configuration. This json file has the extension "pbr_config.json". These configs are referenced in a Scene Dataset config in the same way as stage and object attributes are (their tag is "pbr_ibl_configs"), and support all the same functionality except that they only allow .json file extensions. They are read into a PbrShaderAttributes object, managed by a PbrShaderAttributesManager. One manager exists for MetadataMediator, and is shared with all SceneDatasets that are loaded (much like PhysicsAttributesManager). Also like PhysicsAttributes, there is a system default PbrShaderAttributes config that is part of this PR, that will always be loaded and available as a fallback. Each Scene Instance specifies (or inherits) a "default_pbr_shader_config", which will be a handle to a PbrShaderAttributes already loaded, as well as an object, "pbr_shader_region_configs", which holds key-value pairs consisting of string ids (called 'regions') pointing to PbrShaderAttributes handles.

The processing

During the reconfigure process, right before we instantiate a stage, a call is made to ResourceManager::loadAllIBLAssets to query all the loaded PbrShaderAttributes in the current Scene Dataset(s), in order to load their requested IBL assets (BRDF lookup table image and Equirectangular Environment map) if they are not already loaded. Once each requested pair of assets are loaded into textures, these are sent to the PbrIBLHelper to derive the IrradianceMap and Prefiltered Environment Map Cubemap objects that will be used by the IBL functionality of the PBR shader. The PbrIBLHelper is in turn stored in a map in ResourceManager, keyed by the file names of the bLUT and the EnvMap. The biggest change from main for this functionality is that all the asset loading from disk/resource file is now happening in ResourceManager, once per asset, and all derived textures are being cached so if they get requested again they will not be reloaded/reprocessed. Also, multiple PbrIBLHelpers are now possible, describing different lighting configurations based on different environment maps. The appropriate PbrIBLHelper is still sent to the drawables, as before, but now as part of a DrawableConfiguration object.

The DrawableConfiguration class

This is currently just a carrier struct to hold the various assets we would like to send to the Drawables, regardless of their specific type (Phong or PBR, for instance). It holds constructs that are shared between the drawables, as well as constructs that are unique to one or the other (like the PbrIBLHelper and the PbrShaderAttributes that is pertinent for the PBR drawable, or the Skindata that is being used by the Phong drawable). It is the responsiblity of the consuming class to access what it does or does not properly use. Future support of PBR skin rendering will be facilitated by this structure.

The Drawable/Shader cpp and fragment shader code.

This process is much like the newly added material handling process - the config values are read from the attributes, flag values are set accordingly, and a small struct holding a few floating point values is instanced to hold uniform values. These values are then passed to the shader if appropriate based on flags settings during each draw. The shader class will specify which shader compiler directives to instantiate based on the flags settings as before, and also processes the various non-boolean values that are served to the fragment shader as uniforms. For it's part, the PBR fragment shader was largely already prepared for these changes.

This PR is considered a "breaking change" only because the IBL flag of SimulatorConfiguration is being deprecated and ignored. Any image-based lighting control for PBR drawables will come from PbrShaderAttributes control from here on.

How Has This Been Tested

All c++ and python tests pass. Potential problem with javascript test, which may require recapture of test image due to changes in the default Phong material colors.

Types of changes

  • Docs change / refactoring / dependency upgrade
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have completed my CLA (see CONTRIBUTING)
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. label Jul 11, 2023
@jturner65 jturner65 force-pushed the IBL_Improvements branch 5 times, most recently from 64f7a18 to 5cba1d5 Compare July 18, 2023 13:31
* This class will hold configuration values and utilities for Drawables and the
* shaders that they own.
*/
class DrawableConfiguration {
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jturner65 jturner65 Jul 24, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was made a class and not a struct because I foresee functionality being added/moved from RM in the future. I am not, however, against making it a struct if it is felt that that is more appropriate.

@jturner65 jturner65 self-assigned this Jul 24, 2023
@jturner65 jturner65 marked this pull request as ready for review July 24, 2023 16:40
@jturner65 jturner65 changed the title --[WIP] PBR/IBL Configuration and customization --PBR/IBL Configuration and customization Jul 24, 2023
@jturner65
Copy link
Contributor Author

Due to the size of this PR it may make sense to break it into smaller PRs. Open to suggestions here as well.

Copy link
Contributor

@eundersander eundersander left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good progress! I left some comments.

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know we've had a problem in the past with data files in this folder in the repo, because folks who install via conda won't get this. E.g. they don't get data/default.physics_config.json, so we made sure that the defaults in that file were also the defaults for the class in code.

What will be the process for a Hab-lab user to utilize these PBR options? It would be nice if we had a tutorial or example project that showed users where to put this file and how to reference it (doesn't have to be part of this PR).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was unaware of this :

E.g. they don't get data/default.physics_config.json

I will make sure that the defaults will match.

The primary mechanism to start will be to modify json configs or directly modify/create shader configs using a similar mechanism to the current attributes. And yes, I completely agree about a tutorial, that is my primary concern now.

// TODO:
// should work with the scene instance config, initialize
// different PBR IBLs at different positions in the scene.
std::shared_ptr<Mn::GL::Texture2D> ResourceManager::loadIBLImageIntoTexture(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we move this IBL stuff including loadAllIBLAssets into a separate helper class? My motivations:

  • we may want to re-use this logic with the upcoming batch renderer, which may not instantiate a ResourceManager.
  • ResourceManager is already bloated with 3000+ lines, so it's helpful for readability, etc. to isolate new code into separate files.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree on both counts. Should I put the class in assets?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I defer to you and others on the location.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am going to suggest we postpone this refactor (moving the IBL management code to an external class from RM) until I get the AO attributes/managers and HBAO functionality completed. As it is I think those two tasks should take most of August.

// desired configuration of the PBR shader.
auto mapOfPbrConfigs = metadataMediator_->getAllPbrShaderConfigs();

// Only load if rendering is enabled.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This comment doesn't seem to match the if (requiresTextures_) { code. E.g. that flag will be false if you're doing depth-only rendering.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see. I can modify it to be RGB rendering then.

<< helperKey << "`";
std::shared_ptr<Mn::GL::Texture2D> blutTexture = nullptr;
std::shared_ptr<Mn::GL::Texture2D> envMapTexture = nullptr;
if (pbrIBLHelpers_.count(helperKey) == 0) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see that loadAllIBLAssets is called from Simulator::createSceneInstance, which is called from Simulator::reconfigure ... Are we generally loading these images whenever we reconfigure to a new scene, or just once at startup?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just once per image - once they are loaded they will be retained unless RM is remade as well.

@@ -429,11 +431,159 @@ void initAttributesBindings(py::module& m) {

// TODO : LightLayoutAttributes

// ==== PbrShaderAttributes ====
py::class_<PbrShaderAttributes, AbstractAttributes, PbrShaderAttributes::ptr>(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm curious, for constructing PbrShaderAttributes, what's the purpose of having both python bindings and a codepath for constructing these from JSON? Are we just trying to give Hab-lab users the flexibility of two options for specifying PbrShaderAttributes?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I want to give folks the ability to modify their own shader configurations, but I also want to have the ability to include these configurations in datasets (like we do with object, stage and scene instance attributes).

@jturner65 jturner65 force-pushed the IBL_Improvements branch 4 times, most recently from 0013543 to bc62d8e Compare July 27, 2023 15:11
want to preserve the flags when a material is only being modified so that a new shader is not inadvertently created.
Material class ref removed since we're using the material cache instead.
…phong->PBR materials

Equalizing brightness between PBR and Phong will now take place via PbrConfig settings.
migrating image load functionality out of this class.
pass a configuration structure to the drawables on creation that will be created beforehand and hold appropriate references to various configuration quantities based on the type of drawable.
--also provide more expansive srgb <--> linear control
--The default IBL image has also been changed to one that is not so gold/orange.
Copy link
Contributor

@0mdc 0mdc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good so far! I did a first pass and left some minor comments. I'll have a look at the shader changes tomorrow.

src/tests/AttributesManagersTest.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we store these images in an external repository, along with other assets?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The reason I didn't is that we've always included some default IBL assets as resources, and I wanted to provide a bit of a usable variety as compiled resources so folks didn't have to deal with downloading them.

src/esp/assets/ResourceManager.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/esp/assets/ResourceManager.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/esp/assets/ResourceManager.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/esp/bindings/AttributesBindings.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/esp/bindings/AttributesBindings.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the purpose of this file?

src/esp/sim/SimulatorConfiguration.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/shaders/gfx/equirectangularToCubeMap.frag Show resolved Hide resolved
--If a user modifies or adds a new PbrShaderConfig with new IBL assets, while RM exists without re-running sim::reconfigure and tries to instantiate an object using this new PbrShaderConfig, those new assets will not have been loaded yet. This change makes it so that if they haven't been, they will be loaded and cached.
Copy link
Contributor

@0mdc 0mdc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Copy link
Contributor

@aclegg3 aclegg3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks! Love that IBL is now default, visuals are improving greatly!
A couple of minor comments.
Dont' worry about the JS tests, we can follow up with a solution for that.

@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ void initSimBindings(py::module& m) {
.def_readwrite(
"pbr_image_based_lighting",
&SimulatorConfiguration::pbrImageBasedLighting,
R"(Whether or not to enable image based lighting in the PBR shader.)")
R"(DEPRECATED : Use PbrShaderAttributes to specify whether IBL is enabled or disabled.)")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can slate this for full removal in v0.3.0
Let's make a task to search for and remove any downstream uses of this flag in preperation.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, good idea.

// using the brdflut from here:
// https://github.com/SaschaWillems/Vulkan-glTF-PBR/blob/master/screenshots/tex_brdflut.png

// loadBrdfLookUpTable(blutImageData);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reason to keep this around?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nope, oversight on my part. Thanks for finding it.

Comment on lines +432 to +435
setTonemapExposure(4.5f);
}

setGamma({2.2f, 2.2f, 2.2f});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

constants set empirically?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually that's a reference gamma value specified by IEC in the sRGB standard (kinda out of date - was supposed to model CRTs :D but still in use). It is specified as a uniform more as a kind of heavy handed brightness control, really, when using the sRGB mapping.

@0mdc
Copy link
Contributor

0mdc commented Aug 4, 2023

@aclegg3

Don't worry about the JS tests, we can follow up with a solution for that.

We could probably disable it. We are moving forward with a new web rendering solution using replay rendering instead of simulator rendering.

@jturner65 jturner65 merged commit 4d92aed into main Aug 4, 2023
6 of 10 checks passed
@jturner65 jturner65 deleted the IBL_Improvements branch August 4, 2023 19:59
@jturner65 jturner65 restored the IBL_Improvements branch August 8, 2023 15:28
@jturner65 jturner65 deleted the IBL_Improvements branch August 8, 2023 15:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants