Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename shield_io_timeout to shield_service_timeout #11478

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

JrGoodle
Copy link
Contributor

@JrGoodle JrGoodle commented Jan 8, 2018

Checklist

  • I've run bundle exec rspec from the root directory to see all new and existing tests pass
  • I've followed the fastlane code style and run bundle exec rubocop -a to ensure the code style is valid
  • I've read the Contribution Guidelines
  • I've updated the documentation if necessary.

Motivation and Context

This commit changed the name of this parameter: HazAT/badge@cdf190d

Our CI at work failed to run fastlane because the parameter name change caused an error.

Could not find option 'shield_io_timeout' in the list of available options: dark, alpha, alpha_channel, custom, no_badge, badge_gravity, shield, shield_service_timeout, shield_geometry, shield_gravity, shield_scale, shield_no_resize

After making the changes here and this associated change the build was able to get past the previous error. However now I'm running into a different error when trying to run scan or gym:

uninitialized constant FastlaneCore::PTY::Actions

I'm not sure if this is because of how I'm loading the forked fastlane and plug-in repos, or if it's an actual issue.

Description

This updates the name from shield_io_timeout to shield_service_timeout to match

@googlebot
Copy link

Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.

Once you've signed, please reply here (e.g. I signed it!) and we'll verify. Thanks.


  • If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address on your commit. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
  • If your company signed a CLA, they designated a Point of Contact who decides which employees are authorized to participate. You may need to contact the Point of Contact for your company and ask to be added to the group of authorized contributors. If you don't know who your Point of Contact is, direct the project maintainer to go/cla#troubleshoot. The email used to register you as an authorized contributor must be the email used for the Git commit.
  • In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and have the pull request author add another comment and the bot will run again. If the bot doesn't comment, it means it doesn't think anything has changed.

@JrGoodle
Copy link
Contributor Author

JrGoodle commented Jan 8, 2018

I signed it!

@googlebot
Copy link

CLAs look good, thanks!

@googlebot googlebot added cla: yes and removed cla: no labels Jan 8, 2018
@JrGoodle
Copy link
Contributor Author

JrGoodle commented Jan 8, 2018

The contents of the Gemfile I'm using to test:

# Autogenerated by fastlane
#
# Ensure this file is checked in to source control!

source "https://rubygems.org"

gemspec path: File.expand_path("/Users/jenkins/fastlane")

plugins_path = File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'fastlane', 'Pluginfile')
eval_gemfile(plugins_path) if File.exist?(plugins_path)

gem 'xcpretty'

And the contents of fastlane/Pluginfile:

# Autogenerated by fastlane
#
# Ensure this file is checked in to source control!

gem 'fastlane-plugin-badge', path: "/Users/jenkins/fastlane-plugin-badge"

@KrauseFx
Copy link
Member

KrauseFx commented Jan 8, 2018

Thanks for the PR, really appreciated. This shouldn't have happened, and this PR will also break all fastlane setups using that parameter, I'll reach out to the package author 👍

@JrGoodle
Copy link
Contributor Author

JrGoodle commented Jan 8, 2018

@KrauseFx so should I go ahead and close this PR?

@KrauseFx
Copy link
Member

KrauseFx commented Jan 8, 2018

Seems like it's resolved as soon as a new version by Daniel is pushed 👍

@KrauseFx KrauseFx closed this Jan 8, 2018
@JrGoodle JrGoodle deleted the shield-io branch January 8, 2018 20:24
@fastlane fastlane locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 10, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants