New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] Require relative all the things #13474
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Generated by 🚫 Danger |
Thank you kind Mr. Bot |
So there's good news and bad news. 👍 The good news is that everyone that needs to sign a CLA (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) have done so. Everything is all good there. 😕 The bad news is that it appears that one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that here in the pull request. Note to project maintainer: This is a terminal state, meaning the |
CI tests are now succeeding again after I pushed a tiny bug fix to your branch. Will now test it with https://github.com/janpio/fastlane-manual-integration-tests |
Tested on Windows for typical Android workflow:
Works as expected. |
I'm extremely excited about this PR 👍 Thanks @milch for all your hard work on this |
Do you still see the impressive speed improvements from the original PR @milch? On CI it seems this branch is a tiny-tiny bit slower than current comparison of `benchmark_help_command` lane for this branch and current `master`
Ubuntu
macOS
Windows
Ubuntu
macOS
Windows
|
@janpio Thanks for your testing! Most of the replacements from One big advantage of this plus the previous work that included the missing require checker should be that you'll be able to |
@milch Heyyy 👋 Are you still actively working on this one and wanting this merged in? 🙃 |
@mollyIV Are you maybe interested in having another look at the suggested rubocop from this PR and see if this makes sense in the current context and should be re-tried and then merged? Thanks. |
I feat the failing tests and conflicts are the bigger hurdle here :p @googlebot I consent. |
CLAs look good, thanks! ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
Is there still intent to get this moved forward @milch ? At this point sure if it's worth the effort of solving the merge conflicts, or if it'd be better to start over 😅 |
Supersedes #11507
So since I never got around to completing that PR, and rebasing onto master turned out not so well, I just did some magic code copying around from the old branch and re-ran the rubocop I added here.
Did some fix ups as well after, and some smoke testing, which succeeded.
The reason this is still WIP is because
Require/MissingRequireStatement
rubocop work with theinternal
references