Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 22, 2021. It is now read-only.

Fixed bug in PointGrid mesh ordering - #209

Merged
leouieda merged 6 commits into
masterfrom
pointgrid_bug
Jul 8, 2015
Merged

Fixed bug in PointGrid mesh ordering#209
leouieda merged 6 commits into
masterfrom
pointgrid_bug

Conversation

@leouieda

@leouieda leouieda commented Jul 6, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The grid was mixing up x (North-South, rows) with y (East-West, columns). This is a legacy bug that was fixed in gridder.regular ( #196) but didn't propagate the PointGrid because it wasn't using "regular" to generate its grid. It now uses (also avoids duplicate code) and fixes the order. Had to fix the Bk matrix in the PEL equivalent layer as well.

Checklist:

  • Make tests for new code
  • Create/update docstrings
  • Include relevant equations and citations in docstrings
  • Code follows PEP8 style conventions
  • Code and docs have been spellchecked
  • Include new dependencies in docs, requirements.txt, README, and .travis.yml
  • Documentation builds properly
  • All tests pass
  • Can be merged
  • Changelog entry (leave for last)
  • Firt-time contributor? Add yourself to doc/contributors.rst (leave for last)

The grid was mixing up x (North-South, rows) with y (East-West,
columns). This is a legacy bug that was fixed in gridder.regular but
didn't propagate the PointGrid because it wasn't using "regular" to
generate its grid. It now uses (also avoids duplicate code) and fixes
the order. Had to fix the Bk matrix in the PEL equivalent layer as well.
@leouieda leouieda added this to the 0.4 milestone Jul 6, 2015
leouieda added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2015
Fixed bug in PointGrid mesh ordering
@leouieda
leouieda merged commit 3455514 into master Jul 8, 2015
@leouieda
leouieda deleted the pointgrid_bug branch July 11, 2015 16:37
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant