Add docs for using deoplete with gopls completion #2231
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This recommends configuring the "omni_patterns" parameter, which instructs deoplete to call the omnifunc when a certain regular expression is matched. Found here: Shougo/deoplete.nvim#965
|
Vim-go supports both |
vim-go is now able to work with gocode natively and exposes this by setting the omnifunc. As long as we tell deoplete to call omnifunc, no additional layer is necessary.
|
Good point! I've removed mention of deoplete-go and rephrased the section to not specifically mention either completion back end. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This recommends configuring the "omni_patterns" parameter, which instructs deoplete to call the omnifunc when a certain regular expression is matched.
I found this solution here: Shougo/deoplete.nvim#965
The idea of adding docs for this was discussed here: #2185