Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move to stack for building #2

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 14, 2019

Conversation

onslaughtq
Copy link
Member

This library has been updated to use stack,
with the most recent resolver that has a version
of Happstack server.

This version uses base-4.12, where Semigroup is a
superclass of Monoid, so a few instances had to be
added and modified accordingly.

Addiitionally, there was no default implementation of
inputBool, so that was added so we could have a build
without warnings.

This library has been updated to use stack,
with the most recent resolver that has a version
of Happstack server.

This version uses base-4.12, where Semigroup is a
superclass of Monoid, so a few instances had to be
added and modified accordingly.

Addiitionally, there was no default implementation of
inputBool, so that was added so we could have a build
without warnings.
Copy link
Member

@qxjit qxjit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks great. We just need to decide whether we want to continuing supporting base 4.8 or push the version constraint up to admit that it doesn't work with older versions of base.

@@ -51,20 +51,24 @@ mapErrors f (Invalid errs) = Invalid (f errs)
mapErrors _ valid = valid

-- Instances
instance Semigroup Errors where
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adding Semigroup almost certainly breaks support for base 4.8 unless we use conditional compilation, so we either need to fix that or decided that it's not worth supporting older versions of base with newer updates to redcard

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch on that break. I am of the mind that we should probably start removing base 4.8 support, starting here.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine with that answer. The only implication is that we then can't use newer versions of this library in any codebases that haven't been updated to the latest base yet. redcard hasn't seen a change in quite a while, so that's ok as long as we don't dawdle too long in getting our projects up to the latest lts. There's a small risk we'll feel a little pain if we have to fix a bug in redcard before having completed the lts upgrades, but I think it's rather negligible.

Since Semigroup became a superset of Monoid
with base 4.11, we need to set our constraint
accordingly.
@onslaughtq onslaughtq merged commit df1339a into flipstone:master Jan 14, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants