Add "satisfy respectively" assertion (#882)

[ishymko]

Add "satisfy respectively" assertion, similar to xUnit Assert.Collection (#882).

[dennisdoomen]

Absolutely love this feature!

[jnyrup]

Great implementation 👍

I'm not entirely sure about the name SatisfyRespectively.
From the name, it doesn't immediately strikes me what it's supposed to do.
@dennisdoomen IIRC you have sometimes got valuable feedback from your Twitter network for brainstorming?

[ishymko]

Hmm, tests failed two times in a row at AppVeyor, based on the tests failed, I suppose it's related to #1022. @jnyrup @dennisdoomen can I restart build somehow other than pushing new changes? Tests are passing stable on my machine, so fails are most likely not related to my changes.

[jnyrup]

@vanashimko Thanks for the contribution to Fluent Assertions.
Look out for your name in the next release.

[mdilovar]

Which version will this be available in?

[jnyrup]

@mdilovar It will be available in the next release, which will be 5.7.0.
I can't give a release date, but I can assure you that we're also eager to get the next release out.
We're working as I write on weeding out the last issues before being ready to push the release button.