-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 544
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add "satisfy respectively" assertion (#882) #1043
Add "satisfy respectively" assertion (#882) #1043
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Absolutely love this feature!
Src/FluentAssertions/Collections/GenericCollectionAssertions.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great implementation 👍
I'm not entirely sure about the name SatisfyRespectively
.
From the name, it doesn't immediately strikes me what it's supposed to do.
@dennisdoomen IIRC you have sometimes got valuable feedback from your Twitter network for brainstorming?
Src/FluentAssertions/Collections/GenericCollectionAssertions.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
10e43e9
to
cc703dc
Compare
Hmm, tests failed two times in a row at AppVeyor, based on the tests failed, I suppose it's related to #1022. @jnyrup @dennisdoomen can I restart build somehow other than pushing new changes? Tests are passing stable on my machine, so fails are most likely not related to my changes. |
cc703dc
to
7f7f30b
Compare
@vanashimko Thanks for the contribution to Fluent Assertions. |
Which version will this be available in? |
@mdilovar It will be available in the next release, which will be 5.7.0. |
Add "satisfy respectively" assertion, similar to xUnit
Assert.Collection
(#882).