Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing return to nullably-typed functions #30382

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 20, 2021

Conversation

srawlins
Copy link
Contributor

Adds null statements at the end of functions which have implicit null returns. These functions all have nullable return types (and not void, dynamic`, and upcoming analysis encourages such functions to have explicit returns).

List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue. flutter/flutter#94759

If you had to change anything in the flutter/tests repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the breaking change policy.

Pre-launch Checklist

  • I read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
  • I read the Tree Hygiene wiki page, which explains my responsibilities.
  • I read and followed the Flutter Style Guide and the C++, Objective-C, Java style guides.
  • I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above.
  • I added new tests to check the change I am making or feature I am adding, or Hixie said the PR is test-exempt. See testing the engine for instructions on
    writing and running engine tests.
  • I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
  • I signed the CLA.
  • All existing and new tests are passing.

If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.

@flutter-dashboard
Copy link

It looks like this pull request may not have tests. Please make sure to add tests before merging. If you need an exemption to this rule, contact Hixie on the #hackers channel in Chat.

If you are not sure if you need tests, consider this rule of thumb: the purpose of a test is to make sure someone doesn't accidentally revert the fix. Ask yourself, is there anything in your PR that you feel it is important we not accidentally revert back to how it was before your fix?

Reviewers: Read the Tree Hygiene page and make sure this patch meets those guidelines before LGTMing.

@flutter-dashboard flutter-dashboard bot added platform-web Code specifically for the web engine needs tests labels Dec 16, 2021
@srawlins
Copy link
Contributor Author

CC @yjbanov

@srawlins
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @mdebbar mind taking a look? Simple change, but I need two reviewers.

Copy link
Contributor

@dkwingsmt dkwingsmt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs tests platform-web Code specifically for the web engine
Projects
None yet
3 participants