Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean up NestedScrollView TODOs #84594

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Jun 14, 2021
Merged

Clean up NestedScrollView TODOs #84594

merged 6 commits into from Jun 14, 2021

Conversation

Piinks
Copy link
Contributor

@Piinks Piinks commented Jun 14, 2021

This cleans up two TODOs in nested_scroll_view.dart

These 2 todos both reference the same active issue (#54059). I don't feel that we need to be tracking this active issue as part of our technical debt benchmark. Left the link to the associated issue where it is referenced in the docs.

Pre-launch Checklist

  • I read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
  • I read the Tree Hygiene wiki page, which explains my responsibilities.
  • I read and followed the Flutter Style Guide, including Features we expect every widget to implement.
  • I signed the CLA.
  • I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above.
  • I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
  • I added new tests to check the change I am making or feature I am adding, or Hixie said the PR is test-exempt.
  • All existing and new tests are passing.

If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.

@Piinks Piinks added team Infra upgrades, team productivity, code health, technical debt. See also team: labels. c: tech-debt Technical debt, code quality, testing, etc. labels Jun 14, 2021
@Piinks Piinks requested a review from chunhtai June 14, 2021 20:26
@flutter-dashboard flutter-dashboard bot added the framework flutter/packages/flutter repository. See also f: labels. label Jun 14, 2021
@flutter-dashboard
Copy link

It looks like this pull request may not have tests. Please make sure to add tests before merging. If you need an exemption to this rule, contact Hixie on the #hackers channel in Chat.

If you are not sure if you need tests, consider this rule of thumb: the purpose of a test is to make sure someone doesn't accidentally revert the fix. Ask yourself, is there anything in your PR that you feel it is important we not accidentally revert back to how it was before your fix?

Reviewers: Read the Tree Hygiene page and make sure this patch meets those guidelines before LGTMing.

@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes label Jun 14, 2021
@Hixie
Copy link
Contributor

Hixie commented Jun 14, 2021

test-exempt: only affects comments

Copy link
Contributor

@chunhtai chunhtai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it does more harm than good by removing the todo, based on the issue linked in the doc, there does seem to have an action item.

@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ typedef NestedScrollViewHeaderSliversBuilder = List<Widget> Function(BuildContex
///
/// ### Stretching [SliverAppBar]s
///
// TODO(Piinks): Support stretching, https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/54059
// See https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/54059
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this something we do not want to fix in the future? I took a look at the original issue, I didn't see a concrete suggestion yet. Remove the todo here may make us overlook the issue.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wondered the same, but then I noticed above here on l#337 the same convention was being used. Since there is an active issue I didn't know if this was worth being tallied as part of our tech debt benchmark, when really the intention is to provide context/reference for whomever works on resolving the issue.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think if the issue is worth mentioning, and it's an action item that we should definitely take, then it is by definition a TODO. I wouldn't worry about whether it affects the benchmark or not. Just fiddling the numbers doesn't help concretely. :-)

Copy link
Contributor

@chunhtai chunhtai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c: tech-debt Technical debt, code quality, testing, etc. framework flutter/packages/flutter repository. See also f: labels. team Infra upgrades, team productivity, code health, technical debt. See also team: labels.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants