New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clean up NestedScrollView TODOs #84594
Conversation
It looks like this pull request may not have tests. Please make sure to add tests before merging. If you need an exemption to this rule, contact Hixie on the #hackers channel in Chat. If you are not sure if you need tests, consider this rule of thumb: the purpose of a test is to make sure someone doesn't accidentally revert the fix. Ask yourself, is there anything in your PR that you feel it is important we not accidentally revert back to how it was before your fix? Reviewers: Read the Tree Hygiene page and make sure this patch meets those guidelines before LGTMing. |
test-exempt: only affects comments |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it does more harm than good by removing the todo, based on the issue linked in the doc, there does seem to have an action item.
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ typedef NestedScrollViewHeaderSliversBuilder = List<Widget> Function(BuildContex | |||
/// | |||
/// ### Stretching [SliverAppBar]s | |||
/// | |||
// TODO(Piinks): Support stretching, https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/54059 | |||
// See https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/54059 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this something we do not want to fix in the future? I took a look at the original issue, I didn't see a concrete suggestion yet. Remove the todo here may make us overlook the issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wondered the same, but then I noticed above here on l#337 the same convention was being used. Since there is an active issue I didn't know if this was worth being tallied as part of our tech debt benchmark, when really the intention is to provide context/reference for whomever works on resolving the issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think if the issue is worth mentioning, and it's an action item that we should definitely take, then it is by definition a TODO. I wouldn't worry about whether it affects the benchmark or not. Just fiddling the numbers doesn't help concretely. :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
This cleans up two TODOs in
nested_scroll_view.dart
These 2 todos both reference the same active issue (#54059). I don't feel that we need to be tracking this active issue as part of our technical debt benchmark. Left the link to the associated issue where it is referenced in the docs.
Pre-launch Checklist
///
).If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.