Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend JSC to add R_lite support #1485

merged 5 commits into from Apr 25, 2018


None yet
4 participants
Copy link

dongahn commented Apr 24, 2018

This PR supports the R_lite writer PR which I will post soon to flux-sched.

Also add some minor fixes along the way:

  • Fix encoding errors for RDL query and update within JSC (flux-framework/flux-sched#312 (comment))
  • Remove trailing whitespace in flux-jstat command.
  • Adjust an RDL test needed for the encoding fix.

Add a very simple R_lite test to a JSC test.

@dongahn dongahn force-pushed the dongahn:R_lite_jsc branch from 0b7bd3c to 9a4ba90 Apr 24, 2018


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 24, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.06%) to 78.973% when pulling 9a4ba90 on dongahn:R_lite_jsc into 86d5b32 on flux-framework:master.

@dongahn dongahn referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2018


Add R_lite support #321


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 24, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #1485 into master will decrease coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 47.36%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1485      +/-   ##
- Coverage   78.72%   78.66%   -0.06%     
  Files         164      164              
  Lines       30358    30405      +47     
+ Hits        23900    23919      +19     
- Misses       6458     6486      +28
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/common/libjsc/jstatctl.c 72.35% <40.81%> (-1.92%) ⬇️
src/cmd/flux-jstat.c 85.84% <87.5%> (ø) ⬆️
src/common/libflux/response.c 83.73% <0%> (-0.82%) ⬇️
src/modules/kvs/kvs.c 65.87% <0%> (-0.17%) ⬇️
src/bindings/lua/flux-lua.c 81.58% <0%> (-0.09%) ⬇️
src/common/libflux/message.c 81.48% <0%> (+0.23%) ⬆️
src/broker/overlay.c 74.13% <0%> (+0.31%) ⬆️
src/common/libutil/base64.c 95.77% <0%> (+0.7%) ⬆️

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

dongahn commented Apr 24, 2018

Just posted the corresponding flux-sched PR: flux-framework/flux-sched#321


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

garlick commented Apr 24, 2018

@dongahn, this looks like it solves the problem, and I'm glad you added the test.

I think there are quite a few issues that shouldn't blow by without comment, such as

  • logging within a library
  • embedded synchronous RPCs
  • use of json-c
  • use of functions that assert on malloc failure

However, this code is consistent with hte rest of the library and I think we could merge it as is with the plan to create something new for the new execution system. Is that reasonable?


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

dongahn commented Apr 25, 2018

That sounds reasonable to me. Thanks @garlick.

@garlick garlick merged commit 01e2403 into flux-framework:master Apr 25, 2018

2 of 4 checks passed

codecov/patch 47.36% of diff hit (target 78.72%)
codecov/project 78.67% (-0.06%) compared to 86d5b32
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
coverage/coveralls Coverage decreased (-0.06%) to 78.973%

@grondo grondo referenced this pull request May 10, 2018


0.9.0 Release #1479

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.