Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mobile app #63

Closed
DaniAkash opened this issue Jul 5, 2020 · 7 comments
Closed

Mobile app #63

DaniAkash opened this issue Jul 5, 2020 · 7 comments

Comments

@DaniAkash
Copy link

DaniAkash commented Jul 5, 2020

A mobile/tablet app will make foam so much easier to use. Based on my daily usage, I'd prefer a mobile app similar to GitJournal but focused on quickly creating notes and accessing them using links.

I'd be more than happy to help build a mobile app once we establish a clear list of features 😁

Previously discussed on this tweet thread

@nicholasnadel
Copy link

I'd love this too

@chrisUsick
Copy link
Contributor

I’m interested in a slightly more refined mobile experience (honestly haven’t got into mobile editing yet). I’d be willing and able to contribute to an implementation too. Here is a link to stimulate some ideas on an open source mobile app:
https://standardnotes.org/longevity
StandardNotes, another note taking app (my current preference, for its useful extensions and quality cross platform experience) has shipped an open source mobile app successfully their longevity principles are a contributing factor to their success.

@riccardoferretti
Copy link
Collaborator

@chrisUsick this is a good idea, my first thought would be to properly explore (and document) leveraging compatible applications (e.g. git journal, obsidian mobile, ...) and see what's the delta between that and what we want.

In terms of goals, I reckon the MVP is basically populating an inbox, no need for things like graph, tag explorer, ... which can be added later on.

thoughts?

@chrisUsick
Copy link
Contributor

chrisUsick commented Jul 28, 2021 via email

@riccardoferretti
Copy link
Collaborator

a PR for the docs would be the best place to do it.
If you want to do me a favor and go the extra mile, I'd be happy for you to take a general look at the docs and as you have been using it heavily see how they can be improved (e.g. a useful feature that is documented but not easily discoverable and you didn't know about) or integrated (based on your workflow) - I'd really appreciate it!

@chrisUsick
Copy link
Contributor

chrisUsick commented Jul 30, 2021 via email

@riccardoferretti
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing this for now, as no active dev effort is going on, and workarounds have already been listed in documentation

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants