Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Coding style consistency (stackblitz liquid tag) #1649

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 25, 2019
Merged

Coding style consistency (stackblitz liquid tag) #1649

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 25, 2019

Conversation

Link2Twenty
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

  • Refactor
  • Feature
  • Bug Fix
  • Documentation Update

Description

I refactored the stackblitz liquid tag to make it more consistent with other tags but also added the ability to choose a default view.

Added to documentation?

  • docs.dev.to
  • readme
  • no documentation needed
  • editor guide

Make style more consistent with other liquid tags
Make style more consistent with other liquid tags
Make style more consistent with other liquid tags
@pr-triage pr-triage bot added the PR: unreviewed bot applied label for PR's with no review label Jan 25, 2019
@Link2Twenty Link2Twenty changed the title Coding style consistency Coding style consistency (stackblitz liquid tag) Jan 25, 2019
@pr-triage pr-triage bot added PR: reviewed-approved bot applied label for PR's where reviewer approves changes and removed PR: unreviewed bot applied label for PR's with no review labels Jan 25, 2019
@benhalpern benhalpern merged commit 613d3d4 into forem:master Jan 25, 2019
@pr-triage pr-triage bot added PR: merged bot applied label for PR's that are merged and removed PR: reviewed-approved bot applied label for PR's where reviewer approves changes labels Jan 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PR: merged bot applied label for PR's that are merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants