Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support IDL message definitions #8

Closed
jhurliman opened this issue Nov 8, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #186
Closed

Support IDL message definitions #8

jhurliman opened this issue Nov 8, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #186
Labels
feature New feature or request

Comments

@jhurliman
Copy link
Contributor

Right now we only specify message encoding, not schema encoding so it's not possible to distinguish between ros2msg and ros2idl.
@jhurliman jhurliman added the feature New feature or request label Nov 8, 2022
@achim-k achim-k mentioned this issue Feb 9, 2023
Closed
@jtbandes
Copy link
Member

Linear: FG-1847

@achim-k achim-k mentioned this issue Mar 8, 2023
Merged
achim-k added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 8, 2023
@achim-k
Add support for schemaEncoding field (#186)
572c340 
### Public-Facing Changes

- Add support for `schemaEncoding` field

<!-- describe any changes to the public interface or APIs, or write
"None" -->

### Description
Implements the specification update in
foxglove/ws-protocol#385
Fixes #8
@weidezhang weidezhang mentioned this issue Oct 20, 2023
Closed
@sgf201 sgf201 mentioned this issue Dec 18, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature New feature or request
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Add support for schemaEncoding field foxglove/ros-foxglove-bridge
2 participants
@jtbandes @jhurliman