New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Non sequencial final invoice number - Blocking accountacy issue for France, Swiss, Germany (at least) #22582
Comments
This isn't my domain, can anyone comment on if and how strictly sequential documentation applies in Canada?
… From: "Amaury Van Espen" ***@***.***>
To: "frappe" ***@***.***>
Cc: "Subscribed" ***@***.***>
Sent: Saturday, July 4, 2020 6:38:42 AM
Subject: [frappe/erpnext] Non sequencial final invoice number - Blocking
accountacy issue for France, Swiss, Germany (at least) (#22582)
> Draft is not a submitted invoice. Once it is posted, it can't be changed.
> Deletion can be controlled via permissions. Those who have access to the
> database (self hosted) can do whatever they want. Most countries have systems
> to generate invoice numbers via government API. 3rd party validation is the
> only way this is fool proof. Rest is notional.
> [ https://wm-no.glb.shawcable.net/zimbra/mail# | … ]
Indeed, drafts are not submitted invoices, but they are nevertheless being given
Invoice numbers.
We all understand that everything is mutable if you have access to the hardware,
but this is more of a workflow issue. Notional or not, many of us are bound by
accounting standards that insist on strictly sequential documentation. If we
create a draft and then decide not to submit it, what is the correct way to
move forward?
Originally posted by [ https://github.com/theopen-institute | @theopen-institute
] in [ https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/issues/8765#issuecomment-652261056 |
#8765 (comment) ]
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, [ #22582 |
view it on GitHub ] , or [
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKFYYGWP7XFEI32SLXCUU3RZ4PFFANCNFSM4OQMHP5A
| unsubscribe ] .
|
It may look dumb but what if drafts get their own invoice naming series and once submitted, it takes a valid naming serie invoice? Is it possible to do so? |
Hello, is there any suggestion about fonctional or technical workaround for this issue ? |
Hello, it seems the issue could be solved by a PR (import) from Dokos |
This is a good suggestion as well, and also under the scope of ERPNext rather than affecting the Frappe functionality. Would this be applicable to certain types of DocTypes only? or would it be required as a blanket requirement across all the DocTypes? |
Are there any news on this topic? |
I believe no one at Frappe cares about it. I've left the solution for
another one more compliant and with support
Le mar. 26 oct. 2021 à 14:20, Thomas Strohmeier ***@***.***>
a écrit :
… Are there any news on this topic?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#22582 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABCHPALTBNGDHNYPPCWJ7A3UI2TKBANCNFSM4OQMHP5A>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
|
Indeed, drafts are not submitted invoices, but they are nevertheless being given Invoice numbers.
We all understand that everything is mutable if you have access to the hardware, but this is more of a workflow issue. Notional or not, many of us are bound by accounting standards that insist on strictly sequential documentation. If we create a draft and then decide not to submit it, what is the correct way to move forward?
Originally posted by @theopen-institute in https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/issues/8765#issuecomment-652261056
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: