Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Suggestion : Customer/Supplier view should show Unallocated amounts received/paid #6859

Closed
ai-erp opened this issue Nov 8, 2016 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@ai-erp
Copy link

ai-erp commented Nov 8, 2016

I have noticed that when viewing
customer/supplier module, we can only see the unpaid balance (not effecting the
unallocated amounts paid by the customer or unallocated payments made to
supplier). In actual scenario, there were cases wherein the user of ERPNext
were not able to get advance payments received/paid upon invoicing to
customers/billing to suppliers. In that case, Matching payments with Invoices
have to be done to allocate the amounts received/paid in advance. I suggest to
include this in this area since there are cases that customers are making
advance payments and we are also making advance payments to suppliers. For most
companies, not all users have the access to view GL to check how much has been received/paid
in advance since it is not showing in customer/supplier module.… In the same manner, PDC received/paid should be also seen customer/supplier module. In this case
we suggest to have this feature in viewing customer/supplier in ERPNext. Below
is a sample for your reference:

untitled

cus-

@Devens
Copy link

Devens commented Nov 8, 2016

+1

@harshit-30
Copy link
Contributor

Can you showcase any other tools doing the same?

@harshit-30 harshit-30 self-assigned this Nov 1, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 11, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants