Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ability to use supplier as customer #7497

Closed
vishwajeet opened this issue Jan 16, 2017 · 18 comments
Closed

Ability to use supplier as customer #7497

vishwajeet opened this issue Jan 16, 2017 · 18 comments

Comments

@vishwajeet
Copy link

We have business model where we raise bills to our supplier and in some cases they raise bills to us.
I don't want to create two entries one for customer and other for supplier as in that case reconciliation would be pain.

Say I raise a vendor a bill of 10k and he raise me a bill 10k so ideally net outstanding should be zero but if we have two entries than it will not be the case and would require manual reconciliation and creation of the statement.

Just for your information Odoo does this already, may be a food for thought for ERPNext team to introduce concept of party and allow a party to have customer as well supplier types.

Refer the forum discussion here https://discuss.erpnext.com/t/ability-to-use-supplier-as-customer/19336

@Devens
Copy link

Devens commented Jan 16, 2017

+1

2 similar comments
@mhbu50
Copy link
Contributor

mhbu50 commented Jan 16, 2017

+1

@moosabukhamsin
Copy link

+1

@vishwajeet
Copy link
Author

@rmehta Can you or someone from you team please look into this and comment of feasibility of this? As this is deciding factor for us to use ERPNext or not.

@rmehta
Copy link
Member

rmehta commented Jan 17, 2017

@vishwajeet please evaluate ERPNext as is. If you want this urgently, start a bounty or get some one to fix it for you.

@vishwajeet
Copy link
Author

@rmehta Thanks for quick response. I have already evaluated it as is but this feature is blocker for our business requirement. Bounty and all is fine I can do that but what's the high level effort to get this change done? I am willing to take the efforts for development as well but first want to gauge how deep is the assumption of the supplier and customer roles.

@me2ne
Copy link

me2ne commented Jan 18, 2017

@vishwajeet you can be sponsor to add this feature to erpnext , i can contribute $100 as gift if they add this feature in ERPNEXT . Hope we can find some more sponsor to contribute for this feature .
Regards

@vishwajeet
Copy link
Author

@me2ne Thanks for your support and encouragement. I discuss this with a company working on ERPNext for last 6-7 years and they have given me a feedback it's a sizable amount of work to get this implemented.
So I am not sure if it will be worth the time and effort to get this done, as it stands today I may end up using Odoo. If I get this developed I will surely give it back to community.
Cheers

@rmehta
Copy link
Member

rmehta commented Jan 18, 2017

@ai-erp
Copy link

ai-erp commented Jan 19, 2017

i have posted more details needed in this post #7538

@me2ne
Copy link

me2ne commented Jan 19, 2017

I agree with @ai-erp . post #7538 has more details , let's close this post and i'll post $100 bounty on post #7538. I hope other ERPNEXT user also contribute for this feature .

@vishwajeet
Copy link
Author

@me2ne @ai-erp lets do it. I will also commit $100 to start with.

@vishwajeet
Copy link
Author

@me2ne
Copy link

me2ne commented Jan 19, 2017

hi @rmehta , can you please help to add this post to bounty , i don't know how to add

@me2ne
Copy link

me2ne commented Jan 19, 2017

Thanks @vishwajeet , how we can add github post to bounty ?

@vishwajeet
Copy link
Author

@me2ne it's added automatically I have used #7538 as suggested by you.

@vishwajeet
Copy link
Author

Not sure how to merge two issues. We can close this one and move everything there.

@yashodhank
Copy link
Contributor

closing this thread as more details are on #7538

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants