Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: validation check for batch for stock reconciliation type in stock entry #26370

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jul 14, 2021

Conversation

noahjacob
Copy link
Contributor

@noahjacob noahjacob commented Jul 7, 2021

Issue:

  • There were no filters while selecting batch in stock reconciliation.
    image

  • The check for valid batch no. was skipped if Voucher_Type = "Stock Reconciliation".

Changes

  • Added Filters for batch no.
    image

  • Validation check for batch also validates if Voucher_type is "Stock Reconciliation"

@noahjacob noahjacob added the needs-tests This PR needs automated unit-tests. label Jul 7, 2021
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 7, 2021

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.06%) to 42.989% when pulling 384c9a2 on noahjacob:stock_reco_batch_ux into ccb52f1 on frappe:develop.

@ankush ankush merged commit c932bae into frappe:develop Jul 14, 2021
ankush pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2021
…k entry(bp #26370 ) (#26487)

* fix(ux): added filter for valid batch nos.

* fix: not validating batch no if entry type stock reconciliation

* test: validate batch_no
ankush pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2021
…k entry(bp #26370 ) (#26488)

* fix(ux): added filter for valid batch nos.

* fix: not validating batch no if entry type stock reconciliation

* test: validate batch_no
asoral pushed a commit to asoral/erpnext that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2021
…k entry (frappe#26370)

* fix(ux): added filter for valid batch nos.

* fix: not validating batch no if entry type stock reconciliation

* test: validate batch_no
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants