Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

style: better labels for SLE fields #28988

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 21, 2021
Merged

Conversation

ankush
Copy link
Member

@ankush ankush commented Dec 21, 2021

These things are very confusing to new devs, specifically, the "actual" part is quite pointless. This just renames few labels, not touching the field names for now. (too much patching and breaking change in code)

Actual Qty -> Qty change
Actual Qty After Transaction -> Qty After Transaction
Stock Value -> Balance Stock Value
Stock Value Difference -> Change in Stock Value
Stock Queue (FIFO) -> FIFO Queue (qty, rate)

[skip ci]

Co-Authored-by: marination <maricadsouza221197@gmail.com>
@ankush ankush added the squash Meant to tell reviewers that this PR should be squashed into a single commit while merging. label Dec 21, 2021
@ankush ankush merged commit db7aef2 into frappe:develop Dec 21, 2021
@ankush ankush deleted the style/sle_names branch December 21, 2021 12:09
conncampbell pushed a commit to conncampbell/erpnext that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2022
* style: better labels for SLE fields

* style: rename stock queue field

[skip ci]

Co-Authored-by: marination <maricadsouza221197@gmail.com>
conncampbell pushed a commit to conncampbell/erpnext that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2022
* style: better labels for SLE fields

* style: rename stock queue field

[skip ci]

Co-Authored-by: marination <maricadsouza221197@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
squash Meant to tell reviewers that this PR should be squashed into a single commit while merging.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant