Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unable to build for armv6 in normal mode but works in interactive #585

Open
licaon-kter opened this issue Jan 21, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@licaon-kter
Copy link

FreeBSD 11.1 in a VirtualBox VM

QEMU setup as described here (qemu-...): https://www.dvatp.com/tech/armv6_freebsd_poudriere
Or with cross-compiling like this: http://phaq.phunsites.net/2015/10/11/freebsd-on-armv6-cross-compile-performance-optimization-for-poudriere/
Working fine (with one issue not related to this, afaics) for 40 or so other packages.

Config files: poudriere.conf, x111armv6-make.conf (if using the cross-compile path)

Jail creation command: poudriere jail -c -j x111armv6 -m svn -a arm.armv6 -v release/11.1.0
Normal run command: poudriere bulk -j x111armv6 -f /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/pkglist.txt
Interactive command: poudriere testport -j x111armv6 -i -o sysutils/htop

pkglist.txt contains one line: sysutils/htop
I've build lsof first, just in case that would be an issue.

Output of run command: https://gist.github.com/licaon-kter/5fd1ab6e54adb7ba8ea417cb76541f94 (there is no error log, nor a package log; same output with QEMU)
Output of interactive command: https://gist.github.com/licaon-kter/3cd9f23f656a5e0e506522460a46f566 (same output with cross-compiling)

Yes I did get the package out of the interactive command jail, and it's working fine.

@licaon-kter licaon-kter changed the title Unable to build htop for armv6 in normal mode but works in interactive Unable to build for armv6 in normal mode but works in interactive Jan 25, 2018
@licaon-kter
Copy link
Author

Same for net-im/ejabberd (tested on 17.12 and 18.01)

@bdrewery
Copy link
Member

testport always builds a port but bulk only builds if there are UPDATES to ports. Are you sure there is a reason for bulk to build something?

@licaon-kter
Copy link
Author

licaon-kter commented Jan 25, 2018

Are you sure there is a reason for bulk to build something?

Well, if it was not actually build, shouldn't it build it when I ask it?

Also, ejabberd, I have 17.12, run bulk (it should update to 18.01).... nothing to build.
Run interactive... 3 packages updated, rebuild (pkg, git, pkgconf), 1 new package to build (ejabberd).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants