Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Data Package spec says resources is not required #434

Closed
pwalsh opened this issue May 26, 2017 · 9 comments
Closed

Data Package spec says resources is not required #434

pwalsh opened this issue May 26, 2017 · 9 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@pwalsh
Copy link
Member

pwalsh commented May 26, 2017

However, at some point we agreed it should be.

@pwalsh pwalsh added this to the v1.0 milestone May 26, 2017
@pwalsh pwalsh mentioned this issue Jun 15, 2017
@pwalsh
Copy link
Member Author

pwalsh commented Jun 15, 2017

Depends on #435

@pwalsh
Copy link
Member Author

pwalsh commented Jun 19, 2017

@roll
Copy link
Member

roll commented Jun 19, 2017

http://specs.frictionlessdata.io/data-package/

The descriptor MUST contain a resources property describing the data resources.

It seems it's missed only in Metadata. Required properties but current wording kinda separate it (metadata and resources).

@rufuspollock
Copy link
Contributor

@pwalsh where is it missing? I agree it is a MUST.

@pwalsh
Copy link
Member Author

pwalsh commented Jun 21, 2017

I'll fix.

@rufuspollock
Copy link
Contributor

rufuspollock commented Jun 23, 2017

@pwalsh i was asking where it was missing 😉 - not suggesting we needed a change. I've commented on the PR #467.

@rufuspollock rufuspollock reopened this Jun 23, 2017
@pwalsh
Copy link
Member Author

pwalsh commented Jul 3, 2017

@rufuspollock I've read everything in #467 and the distinctions you are making about different types of metadata are very specific and don't make a lot of sense to me. Can you please do the PR to get this how you want it to be.

@pwalsh pwalsh assigned rufuspollock and unassigned rufuspollock and pwalsh Jul 3, 2017
@rufuspollock
Copy link
Contributor

@pwalsh let's chat quickly about this please - i think 5m on a call will save 30m in issues 😉

@rufuspollock
Copy link
Contributor

As we did not get the 5m chat I'm leaving this closed for now /cc @pwalsh

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants