-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some files mention licenses different than Unlicense. #405
Comments
I guess they were copied across. Just switch them all to Unlicense. |
Well, I guess we should just list the different licenses until people approve I give permission to switch the Microsoft Pluralizer sample code to Unlicense cc @gneverov for the others |
I give permission to switch the two "F# async extensions" files to Unlicense. |
I managed to contact @gneverov via email:
|
Approved by @gneverov via email - see: fsprojects#405 (comment)
Description
The whole package is licensed under Unlicese, but some of the files mention different licenses.
Files:
FSharpx.Extras/docs/Santa.fsx
Lines 1 to 12 in ac5053b
FSharpx.Extras/src/FSharpx.Extras/Stm.fs
Lines 1 to 12 in d51ce76
FSharpx.Extras/src/FSharpx.Extras/Pluralizer.fs
Lines 1 to 11 in d51ce76
FSharpx.Extras/docs/StructuredFormatSample.fsx
Lines 1 to 4 in ac5053b
FSharpx.Extras/src/FSharpx.Extras/Net.fs
Lines 1 to 4 in d51ce76
FSharpx.Extras/docs/WebProxy.fsx
Lines 1 to 4 in ac5053b
@tpetricek @dsyme Do you know if it was intentional or they were omitted by mistake? Do you know what needs to be done in order to fix that?
cc @forki for help as he may know/remember more - license change was made in his commit 80133ee#diff-4673a3aba01813b595de187a7a6e9e63a3491d55821606fecd9f13a10c188a1d
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: