386: revise base64url description

[ahwagner]

No description provided.

[ahwagner]

This closes #386. @jmarshall your review here is welcome.

[jmarshall]

🤷 I think it's good that the introductory paragraph uses familiar terms, while steps 1–3 are more precise.

So I would just delete /URL/ leaving and [Base64](link) encoding. Or write out and the URL-friendly variant of [Base64](link) encoding if you wanted to avoid accusations of conceivably being misleading.

But it's all a bit bikesheddy, so whatever is good.

[jmarshall]

Yeesh, how on earth did the readthedocs run for the first commit succeed? 😄 Has there been a massive readthedocs update in the last fourteen hours?

[ahwagner]

I think Jinja2 is the culprit, made a breaking change in a minor version release an hour ago that Sphinx wasn't expecting: https://pypi.org/project/Jinja2/#history

[jmarshall]

Yep. Looks like Sphinx 4.x would be insulated against the change BTW: sphinx-doc/sphinx@e5c905c.

[ahwagner]

@larrybabb and/or @andreasprlic you good with these changes?

[larrybabb]

sorry for the delay.