-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 867
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GCC2019 Admin Training feedback clarifications and improvements #1445
Merged
hexylena
merged 24 commits into
galaxyproject:master
from
natefoo:gcc-2019-admin-training-feedback-fixes
Jul 17, 2019
Merged
GCC2019 Admin Training feedback clarifications and improvements #1445
hexylena
merged 24 commits into
galaxyproject:master
from
natefoo:gcc-2019-admin-training-feedback-fixes
Jul 17, 2019
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
nsoranzo
reviewed
Jul 6, 2019
nsoranzo
reviewed
Jul 6, 2019
nsoranzo
reviewed
Jul 6, 2019
Co-Authored-By: Nicola Soranzo <nicola.soranzo@gmail.com>
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
…atefoo/training-material into gcc-2019-admin-training-feedback-fixes
nsoranzo
reviewed
Jul 12, 2019
nsoranzo
reviewed
Jul 12, 2019
nsoranzo
reviewed
Jul 12, 2019
Ok huge amount of detail has been added, would appreciate review. It's out of WIP from my side, maybe @natefoo has some additional items. |
nsoranzo
reviewed
Jul 15, 2019
…atefoo/training-material into gcc-2019-admin-training-feedback-fixes
Co-Authored-By: Helena Rasche <hxr@hx42.org> Co-Authored-By: Nicola Soranzo <nicola.soranzo@gmail.com>
@natefoo anything more for removing the WIP label? |
hexylena
approved these changes
Jul 16, 2019
natefoo
changed the title
[WIP] GCC2019 Admin Training feedback clarifications and improvements
GCC2019 Admin Training feedback clarifications and improvements
Jul 16, 2019
@erasche nope! |
Thanks all! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Clarifications and improvements to the Installing with Ansible exercise identified during the 2019 GCC.
Maintainers, feel free to commit directly to my fork/branch. Everyone else, feel free to suggest changes using the Github feature or as comments.
Other stuff
certbot_environment: staging
since the rate limit on production certs is 50 per domain per week. The downside is cert validation warnings, which is a bummer, but unless we get a bunch of specialty training domains I'm not sure what alternative we have.tool_path
inshed_tool_conf.xml
shed_tool_data_dir
job_conf.xml
and other common configs