Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

scRNA workflow #969

Closed
wants to merge 42 commits into from
Closed

scRNA workflow #969

wants to merge 42 commits into from

Conversation

mtekman
Copy link
Contributor

@mtekman mtekman commented Aug 21, 2018

Clean version


# Analysis Strategy

Most scRNA sequencing techniques use pooled-sequencing approaches to generate a higher throughput of data by performing amplification and sequencing upon multiple cells in the same "pool". From a bioinformatics standpoint, this means that the output FASTQ data from the sequencer is batch-specific and contains all the sequences from multiple cells.
Copy link
Collaborator

@erxleben erxleben Aug 24, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What are multiple cells? Just many of the same type and not a single or different cell types together?

What is a batch? What means batch-specific?

Write FASTQ not in capitals

Copy link
Contributor

@wm75 wm75 Feb 1, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with @erxleben that batch should be explained a little bit

Copy link
Member

@bebatut bebatut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry 😟

topics/transcriptomics/metadata.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tutorial_name: scrna
---

<style>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you remove the styling here?
We try to keep only Markdown here. If you need some special formatting, we should see how we can handle it more generally.

topics/transcriptomics/metadata.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@shiltemann
Copy link
Member

Hi @mtekman, we changed the way we add metadata in this repository, and I've updated your PR accordingly, the metadata is now added at the top of the tutorial.md file :)

@wm75
Copy link
Contributor

wm75 commented Feb 1, 2019 via email

@bebatut bebatut changed the title [WIP] scRNA workflow scRNA workflow Feb 1, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@wm75 wm75 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

finished the barcodes section

<!-- Questions for team

* Does it make sense to split out the Understanding Barcodes section into its own tutorial
* Does it make sense to split out the Understanding Plates and Batches into its own tutorial
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes and yes to the above, but maybe into only one additional tutorials (plates, batches and barcodes)?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed, already I can see how entangled these topics are.

> 1. Create a new history and rename it (*e.g.* scRNA-seq single batch tutorial)
> 1. Import the following files from [`Zenodo`](https://zenodo.org/record/2554612) or from the data library (ask your instructor)
> ```
> https://zenodo.org/record/2554612/files/SRR5683689_1.fastq.gz?download=1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do the files used here have to be different from the ones used in the barcode section?
Would simplify the logic substantially if there was only one input dataset.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The whole barcoding example was based on a dataset I previously used, but later dropped due to it being low quality. I saw two options:

  1. Rewrite this entire section taking into account the new data
  2. Split this off into it's own hands-on tutorial because it relies only on two files

Copy link
Contributor

@wm75 wm75 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

part 1 done

@mtekman
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtekman commented Feb 1, 2019

thank you so much for the review @wm75

@mtekman mtekman closed this Feb 8, 2019
@mtekman mtekman deleted the scrna3 branch February 8, 2019 14:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants