Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unitary #20

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 5, 2021
Merged

Unitary #20

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 5, 2021

Conversation

maxhauck
Copy link
Collaborator

@maxhauck maxhauck commented Sep 21, 2021

All geometric subgroups of SU(d, q).

Includes the fixes in #13. Fixes #24. Fixes #15.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 21, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #20 (0c92168) into main (f25cc6d) will increase coverage by 6.31%.
The diff coverage is 85.25%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #20      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.22%   81.53%   +6.31%     
==========================================
  Files          12       14       +2     
  Lines        1663     1950     +287     
==========================================
+ Hits         1251     1590     +339     
+ Misses        412      360      -52     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
gap/Utils.gd 100.00% <ø> (ø)
gap/Utils.gi 94.11% <50.00%> (+1.05%) ⬆️
gap/Forms.gi 72.56% <72.56%> (ø)
gap/ClassicalMaximals.gi 46.81% <88.78%> (+34.51%) ⬆️
gap/SemilinearMatrixGroups.gi 89.81% <94.11%> (+3.14%) ⬆️
gap/TensorInducedMatrixGroups.gi 96.19% <96.29%> (+0.11%) ⬆️
gap/ExtraspecialNormalizerMatrixGroups.gi 94.27% <100.00%> (-0.06%) ⬇️
gap/Forms.gd 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
gap/ImprimitiveMatrixGroups.gi 95.19% <100.00%> (+0.85%) ⬆️
gap/SubfieldMatrixGroups.gi 92.45% <100.00%> (+3.83%) ⬆️
... and 6 more

@ssiccha ssiccha mentioned this pull request Sep 21, 2021
gap/ReducibleMatrixGroups.gi Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
gap/ReducibleMatrixGroups.gi Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
gap/ReducibleMatrixGroups.gi Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
gap/Utils.gi Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fingolfin fingolfin mentioned this pull request Sep 21, 2021
3 tasks
@maxhauck maxhauck changed the title Unitary C1 Unitary Sep 24, 2021
@ssiccha
Copy link
Collaborator

ssiccha commented Sep 29, 2021

Parts of this PR were merged in via #22. The comments by @fingolfin will be adressed in this PR.

gap/Forms.gi Show resolved Hide resolved
gap/Forms.gi Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
gap/SemilinearMatrixGroups.gi Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@maxhauck maxhauck mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2021
gap/Forms.gi Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@maxhauck maxhauck marked this pull request as ready for review October 1, 2021 13:35
@maxhauck maxhauck mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2021

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (main@d437a95). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head c07e55d differs from pull request most recent head 807985c. Consider uploading reports for the commit 807985c to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #20   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   83.59%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       14           
  Lines           ?     1981           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     1656           
  Misses          ?      325           
  Partials        ?        0           

@ssiccha ssiccha force-pushed the mh/case-unitary branch 2 times, most recently from 4bba041 to b718577 Compare October 5, 2021 14:54
Co-authored-by: maxhauck <mahauck@rhrk.uni-kl.de>
@ssiccha
Copy link
Collaborator

ssiccha commented Oct 5, 2021

DefaultFieldOfMatrixGroup is not tested here yet. This is done in #36.

@ssiccha ssiccha merged commit 0f714ca into gap-packages:main Oct 5, 2021
@maxhauck maxhauck deleted the mh/case-unitary branch October 6, 2021 10:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use InvariantXForm Add more unit tests
3 participants