Fix derive-reqt modelbrowser icon #2626
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Changed icon id in stencil.svg derive → derive-reqt * Ran makefile to re-generate icons from the stencil * Made necessary changes in hardcoded icon paths in requirementstoolbox The bug most probably originated by a previous makefile run removing derive-reqt icon because it was not in the stencil.
marek-piirikivi
force-pushed
the
fix_missing_derive_relationship_icon
branch
from
1f5a750
to
41a921c
Compare
|
Looks good! |
3 tasks
danyeaw
added
fix
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The bug most probably originated by a previous makefile run removing derive-reqt icon because it was not in the stencil.
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: #2622
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information