Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix etcd image for tests #280

Merged

Conversation

shreyas-s-rao
Copy link
Collaborator

Signed-off-by: Shreyas Rao shreyas.sriganesh.rao@sap.com

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR fixes failing TM tests due to etcd version mismatch.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

NONE

Signed-off-by: Shreyas Rao <shreyas.sriganesh.rao@sap.com>
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added needs/review Needs review size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Nov 3, 2020
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) reviewed/ok-to-test-tm Has approval for running integration tests on TestMachinery labels Nov 3, 2020
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added needs/ok-to-test-tm Requires integration tests to be run on TestMachinery and removed reviewed/ok-to-test-tm Has approval for running integration tests on TestMachinery labels Nov 3, 2020
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Nov 3, 2020
@shreyas-s-rao
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@amshuman-kr the tm_test CI step still fails in this PR. It would work once merged into master. PTAL.

Copy link
Collaborator

@amshuman-kr amshuman-kr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. However, I am unable to run performance regression test because go get is no longer working for etcd benchmark due to etcd-io/etcd#12124 (comment). Considering that the issue on etcd has been open now for 4 months should we go ahead and merge this PR already?

@gardener-robot gardener-robot removed the needs/review Needs review label Nov 3, 2020
@amshuman-kr
Copy link
Collaborator

Tangent: I have created #281 to track the movement of performance regression test to test machinery integration tests.

@shreyas-s-rao
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@amshuman-kr Yes, we can address the perf regression tests in a separate PR, where we integrate it with the TM tests. Merging this PR now.

@shreyas-s-rao shreyas-s-rao merged commit a01dcb6 into gardener:master Nov 4, 2020
@shreyas-s-rao shreyas-s-rao deleted the fix/int-test-image-versions branch November 4, 2020 03:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/test Test needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) needs/ok-to-test-tm Requires integration tests to be run on TestMachinery size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants