Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[release-v1.24] Automated cherry pick of #4268: Fix the SNI transition for the kube-apiserver Service #4276

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 30, 2021
Merged

[release-v1.24] Automated cherry pick of #4268: Fix the SNI transition for the kube-apiserver Service #4276

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 30, 2021

Conversation

ialidzhikov
Copy link
Member

/area/quality
/kind/bug
/kind/regression

Cherry pick of #4268 on release-v1.24.

#4268: Fix the SNI transition for the kube-apiserver Service

Release Notes:

An issue causing the SNI transition step to fail for a cluster that still didn't transitioned to SNI is now fixed.

@ialidzhikov
Fix the SNI transition for the kube-apiserver Service
90e5f51 
Signed-off-by: ialidzhikov <i.alidjikov@gmail.com>
@ialidzhikov ialidzhikov requested a review from a team as a code owner June 29, 2021 13:34
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added area/quality Output qualification (tests, checks, scans, automation in general, etc.) related kind/bug Bug kind/regression Bug that hit us already in the past and that is reappearing/requires a proper solution needs/review size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 29, 2021
vpnachev
vpnachev approved these changes Jun 29, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@vpnachev vpnachev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@ialidzhikov ialidzhikov merged commit a7f7fc0 into gardener:release-v1.24 Jun 30, 2021
@ialidzhikov ialidzhikov deleted the automated-cherry-pick-of-#4268-origin-release-v1.24 branch June 30, 2021 05:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@vpnachev vpnachev vpnachev approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/quality Output qualification (tests, checks, scans, automation in general, etc.) related kind/bug Bug kind/regression Bug that hit us already in the past and that is reappearing/requires a proper solution size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
5 participants
@ialidzhikov @vpnachev @gardener-robot-ci-1 @gardener-robot-ci-3 @gardener-robot