Proposal for backup infra controller redesign #932
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rfranzke
added
area/disaster-recovery
Merged
rfranzke
reviewed
Apr 16, 2019
swapnilgm
force-pushed
the
backup-infra-update
branch
from
0734d45
to
4fff0ca
Compare
Signed-off-by: Swapnil Mhamane <swapnil.mhamane@sap.com>
swapnilgm
force-pushed
the
backup-infra-update
branch
from
4fff0ca
to
298d0bf
Compare
|
@rfranzke Thank you for the review. I have update the doc addressing your queries. |
gardener-robot
added
priority/3
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: Swapnil Mhamane swapnil.mhamane@sap.com
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR include the design proposal for gardener/etcd-backup-restore#141.
Main goal is to use shared backup bucket among shoots. Things are explained in proposal docs in details.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
As per internal discussion we (@amshuman-kr @vlerenc @shreyas-s-rao )agree on it. And it is ready to be implemented. Please feel free to suggest any changes considering the extensibility proposal.
Release note: