Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Binary body recording #70

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

I159
Copy link

@I159 I159 commented Jul 23, 2018

During recording a S3 object retrieving request the library raises TypeError while the response is totally valid and changing actual response, thus request couldn't be finished.

@I159 I159 force-pushed the binary_body_recording branch 5 times, most recently from 757d03e to 4aae96b Compare July 24, 2018 07:47
During recording a S3 object retrieving request the library raises
`TypeError` while the response is totally valid. Response json data
 is copied including streaming body to handle potential
issues with binary data without affecting original binary payload.
@kiwiz
Copy link

kiwiz commented Jan 14, 2020

@garnaat We started hitting this issue too. Could this PR be merged?

@garnaat
Copy link
Owner

garnaat commented Jan 15, 2020

There are some merge conflicts at the moment. If the author wants to resolve those, that would be great. Otherwise I can do it and get it merged.

@davidyum
Copy link

davidyum commented Feb 6, 2020

+1 just ran into this error too. Would be great if you could merge

@TheBishopOfSoho
Copy link

+1 just ran into this error too. Would be great if you could merge

Another +1 to the mix, ran into this while recording a session that pulls a file from S3.

@adhorn
Copy link

adhorn commented Sep 10, 2021

+1 running into this issue to with AppConfig.

garnaat pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2021
@garnaat garnaat mentioned this pull request Sep 24, 2021
garnaat added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2021
* Updating supported Python versions

* Trying another approach to fix PR #70.

* Removing caveman debug print statements.

Co-authored-by: Mitch Garnaat <garnaat@amazon.com>
@garnaat
Copy link
Owner

garnaat commented Sep 27, 2021

This should be fixed with a different approach in #79

@garnaat garnaat closed this Sep 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants