Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(blog): blog post about adding react hooks #11513

Closed
entorenee opened this issue Feb 3, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

docs(blog): blog post about adding react hooks #11513

entorenee opened this issue Feb 3, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
type: documentation An issue or pull request for improving or updating Gatsby's documentation

Comments

@entorenee
Copy link
Contributor

Description

I recently converted my Gatsby Portfolio site to use React Hooks in advance of the stable release on February 4th, 2019. Blog post to include pragmatic take aways from converting to React Hooks as well as implementation within a Gatsby site. I ran into a few gotchas which are included in the draft post.

@sidharthachatterjee sidharthachatterjee added type: documentation An issue or pull request for improving or updating Gatsby's documentation status: inkteam to review labels Feb 4, 2019
@sidharthachatterjee
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you so much for opening this and for the associated blog post, @dslemay! Someone from the team will review your post soon.

DSchau pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2019
## Description

Adds a blog post discussing some of the benefits of converting some components to use React Hooks. Also touches on structuring React Hooks in a Gatsby project and some things to be aware of, including the `useEffect` hook and Gatsby's build process.

## Related Issues

Related to #11513
@marcysutton
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this was merged, yay! 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: documentation An issue or pull request for improving or updating Gatsby's documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants