-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(blog): add blogpost about gatsbyjs.org redesign #12337
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great post! I left a few minor comments. Thanks for writing!
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ | |||
--- | |||
title: ".org Prototype Test Blogpost" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this title could be improved a bit, perhaps something like "Prototype Testing for Gatsby.org"?
- What is the purpose of the homepage? | ||
- How do we know if we’re succeeding in that purpose? | ||
|
||
It is important to the Gatsby community to solve these problems, because tons of new visitors come to the gatsbyjs.org homepage each month. 130,000 in January alone! We want to make sure we’re accurately representing Gatsby’s value there and helping more developers experience Gatsby’s value by clicking the “get started” button. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This would become a complete sentence with a colon instead of a period: "each month: 130,000 in January alone!"
|
||
### Review design requirements | ||
|
||
We briefly reminded ourselves of what the current homepage looks like on mobile, and then review the following information on the requirements for redesigning the homepage: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Verb tenses should match if possible: then reviewed the following
|
||
We left the prototype workshop with a few concerns that could be validated through testing: | ||
|
||
- Logos of companies could turn off developers b/c it’s cliche and sometimes meaningless or they could provide social proof that world-class engineers use Gatsby. We’ll test this. Possibility is to combine the logos with case studies so they aren’t in the classic “logos floating on white space” design that most startups use. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Love the self-awareness here. 👍
|
||
### Settled concerns: | ||
|
||
"Install Gatsby" is an more specific call to action, so better than “Get Started” probably. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Better than "Get Started" how? It seems like the inverse is true for .org homepage messaging...?
![Screenshot of gatsbyjs.org homepage on a mobile device](mobile-prototype-2019-03-01.png) | ||
[Move diagram above card and change explanatory text](https://github.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby/pull/12236) | ||
|
||
And then refined those changes by changing the headline and subheadline. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be a complete sentence: "Then we refined those changes by modifying..."
@marcysutton great feedback! since @shannonbux is out I took the liberty of incorporating it into the PR, and will approve and merge so it can go live on Monday morning! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great post @shannonbux!
Thanks all for the help getting this merged while I was offline on a plane
and then out of town. Appreciate it! I went back in a couple days ago to do
minor polishing.
…On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 1:52 PM Sam Bhagwat ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** approved this pull request.
Great post @shannonbux <https://github.com/shannonbux>!
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#12337 (review)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/Ae9o2hrwveZHJZVgvQtH4eEIkvDBmdT8ks5vVC00gaJpZM4bfswG>
.
|
Thanks!
…On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 2:07 PM Sam Bhagwat ***@***.***> wrote:
Merged #12337 <#12337> into master.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#12337 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/Ae9o2tU5dh_aswi_a3C3MnR2GTPE_64pks5vVDCGgaJpZM4bfswG>
.
|
When is a good date to publish this one, @lindaleebumblebee?