-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gratia support for other regression packages #227
Comments
I've been a bit inconsistent with this but where appropriate I planned to support Are there models/functions/packages that you are especially interested in? And which functions in gratia would you like to see supported for them? There are other more general options for a wider range of model types, like marginaleffects. |
That makes sense. I was not aware that Outside of Tagging @seananderson in the hopes that this one day becomes reality |
Opening this up again as glmmTMB has added spline support, see There is some discussion of adding support in gratia. Looking through the code it seems that there would need to be a draw.glmmTMB method as well as a smooths.glmmTMB method to find all the smooth terms in the glmmTMB structure. Is there anything I am missing, pretty sure there is more |
@authagag Oh, that saves me a job then as I had been looking at what would be required to add smooths to glmmTMB, gamm4-style. The main thing that would be needed would be I can take a look at glmmTMB/glmmTMB#928 and install from the repo and see what would be needed from gratia's point of view. |
Hi! I love this package and I use it all the time. It's my go-to for visualizing and diagnosing GAMs on the fly.
My only critique is that I can't use it with other packages that I also use frequently like base stats or glmmTMB. I know it's a big ask, but it would be great to see gratia support for these packages in the future.
Thanks!
Sean
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: