New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
use of NOT #3
Comments
Logged In: YES I’ve added a little bit — and the qualifier documentation m Original comment by: mah11 |
Logged In: YES yep close Original comment by: ValWood |
Logged In: YES ok! :) Original comment by: mah11 |
- assigned_to: nobody —> gomidori Original comment by: mah11 |
reopened by accident (text was misread as a GitHub cross-reference), so this can be closed again by someone with the right powers @ValWood ? |
I just started using NOT and reilised I have used it
incorrectly.
I annotated a gene to
NOT Golgi to vacuole transport
based on the evidence of no mis-sorting of
carboxypeptidase Y in PMID: 14575697 suggesting that
the Pep12 homolog is not required for vacuolar protein
transport
I reilised it was incorrect to annotate somthing to NOT
based on this kind of negative evidence.
i.e. not required for but may be involved in
and
not required for this particular product (assay)
This may be an example where the annotation guidelines
could be extended to make the use of NOT expicit for
first time users.
with examples.
Reported by: ValWood
Original Ticket: geneontology/annotation-issues/3
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: