Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use of NOT #3

Closed
gocentral opened this issue Nov 4, 2003 · 5 comments
Closed

use of NOT #3

gocentral opened this issue Nov 4, 2003 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@gocentral
Copy link

I just started using NOT and reilised I have used it
incorrectly.

I annotated a gene to
NOT Golgi to vacuole transport
based on the evidence of no mis-sorting of
carboxypeptidase Y in PMID: 14575697 suggesting that
the Pep12 homolog is not required for vacuolar protein
transport

I reilised it was incorrect to annotate somthing to NOT
based on this kind of negative evidence.
i.e. not required for but may be involved in
and
not required for this particular product (assay)

This may be an example where the annotation guidelines
could be extended to make the use of NOT expicit for
first time users.
with examples.

Reported by: ValWood

Original Ticket: geneontology/annotation-issues/3

@gocentral
Copy link
Author

Logged In: YES
user_id=436423

I’ve added a little bit — and the qualifier documentation
has changed a lot since this item came in. Have a look
and see if it’ll do (then we could close this!).

m

Original comment by: mah11

@gocentral
Copy link
Author

Logged In: YES
user_id=516865

yep close
forgot this one even existed….

Original comment by: ValWood

@gocentral
Copy link
Author

Logged In: YES
user_id=436423

ok! :)

Original comment by: mah11

@gocentral
Copy link
Author

- assigned_to: nobody —> gomidori
- status: open —> closed-fixed

Original comment by: mah11

@deustp01
Copy link

deustp01 commented Nov 1, 2023

reopened by accident (text was misread as a GitHub cross-reference), so this can be closed again by someone with the right powers @ValWood ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants
@ValWood @deustp01 @gocentral and others