Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NTR: Xyloside xylosyltransferase activity #16869

Closed
hattrill opened this issue Jan 28, 2019 · 20 comments
Closed

NTR: Xyloside xylosyltransferase activity #16869

hattrill opened this issue Jan 28, 2019 · 20 comments

Comments

@hattrill
Copy link

Could I request:

name: xyloside xylosyltransferase activity

Def: UDP-xylose:α-xyloside α1,3-xylosyltransferase actvity, adding an xylose to an O-linked xylose-glucose acceptor (xylose-α1,3-glucoseβ1-O-Ser/Thr).
(Sorry, this is a bit weak - could do with a bit of editior input.)

Xrefs:EC:2.4.2.n3
RHEA:22820
RHEA:56600
PMID:22117070

Reaction (from EC): UDP-alpha-D-xylose + alpha-D-xylose-(1->3)-beta-D-glucosyl-R <=> UDP + alpha-D-xylose-(1->3)-alpha-D-xylose-(1->3)-beta-D-glucosyl-R

This is to annotate a xyloside xylosyltransferase that adds a second xylose to Notch Receptor EGF repeats - the RHEA xrefs are specific for EGF repeats, but the EC is not - I don't think that the nature of the underlining structure should matter for the activity (ie any glycoprotein acceptor will do).

Is_a:
UDP-xylosyltransferase activity GO:0035252

@deustp01
Copy link

"The RHEA xrefs are specific for EGF repeats, but the EC is not"
In a case like this where the reaction chemistry itself is the same for both protein participants, would it be possible to ask Rhea to broaden their reaction annotation to use a generic protein? Getting grandiose, could Rhea be proactive and, where it's clear that the reaction to be annotated could proceed with any of a variety of specific proteins as inputs, create the Rhea reaction with a generic protein input in the first place?
@ukemi @amorgat

@ukemi
Copy link
Contributor

ukemi commented Jan 28, 2019

We don't want a single GO MF to point to more than one Rhea reaction. We want to be able to capture them precisely and take their definitions. @hattrill, does either of the rhea reactions fit your annotation needs?

@deustp01
Copy link

But would you want different MF terms for the xylosylation by the identical molecular mechanism of two different specific peroteins, or would you want oine term for the xylosylation of a protein family or generic [rotein?

@amorgat
Copy link

amorgat commented Jan 28, 2019

"The RHEA xrefs are specific for EGF repeats, but the EC is not"

WARNING: EC:2.4.2.n3 is a preliminary EC. It is NOT an official IUBMB entry.
There is a warning in the IntEnz page (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/intenz/query?cmd=SearchID&id=19969) but not in the enzyme@ExPASy page (https://enzyme.expasy.org/EC/2.4.2.n3)
"This is a preliminary EC number. The content has not yet been validated and included in the official IUBMB Enzyme list."

There are 2 Rhea reactions because the enzyme can acts on 3-O-[α-D-xylosyl-(1→3)-β-D-glucosyl]-L-seryl residue or 3-O-[α-D-xylosyl-(1→3)-β-D-glucosyl]-L-threonyl residue

We (SIB) are in the process to re-organize enzyme classification data. I think this preliminary EC is in
Kristian's to-do list. @kaxelsen, please would you comment on EC:2.4.2.n3?

@deustp01
"Getting grandiose, could Rhea be proactive and, where it's clear that the reaction to be annotated could proceed with any of a variety of specific proteins as inputs, create the Rhea reaction with a generic protein input in the first place?"
Yes, this is definitely the direction we want to go! Will be discussed during our Rhea meeting this week.

@hattrill
Copy link
Author

hattrill commented Jan 28, 2019

It's the molecular mechanism that I want to differentiate, rather than the underlying protein backbone. ie the dixylose linkage formed and the underlying substrate protein-O-Glc-Xyl, is the interesting bit - the EGF repeat I am not so fussed about. (But, I haven't come across this dixylose-Glc-O-X modification in non-EGF repeats, but I have not looked exhaustively.)

I'd just be happy with capturing the transfer of xylose from UDP-xylose to xylose-R to make xylose-α1,3-xylose-R . This particular enzyme does not catalyse the addition of more xyloses, so dixylose-R is the product. The preliminary EC, EC:2.4.2.n3 captures the Xyl-Glc-R substrate. (It would be good for us (FlyBase) to have an EC xref in the GO, as we use this xref in other pipelines.)

In relation to other points - The particular enzymatic activity that I am curating results in the addition of a xyl to a Protein-Ser-O-Glc-Xyl of the EGF repeats of Notch receptor. RHEA:22820 describes this reaction. I do not need this much detail for the MF term.

@kaxelsen
Copy link

I have now looked at this pathway both in Rhea and in the IUBMB nomenclature.

  1. I have updated EC 2.4.2.42 at IUBMB (covering GXYLT1 and GXYLT2). The reaction described was actually more specific than the one in Rhea, as it was described for "-EGF-like domain of bovine factor IX(45-87)". I have now changed it to "EGF domain containing protein" using the agreed nomenclature for the carbohydrate part of the reaction. I have realised RHEA:56564 is wrong, as the glycosylation only takes place on serine amino acids in the CXSXPC motif of the EGF domains, and not on threonine residues as described in RHEA:56564.
  2. I have created a new EC number at IUBMB covering the preliminary EC 2.4.2.n3. This covers the activity of XXYLT1. For this entry, RHEA:56600 is wrong (threonyl residue).
  3. I have created two EC numbers covering the activity of POGLUT1 (or rumi in fruit flies) that catalyzes the first step in the pathway, and in addition has xylosyltransferase activity. The two EC numbers will be in classes: EC 2.4.2. (xylosyltransferase activity) and EC 2.4.1 (glucosyltransferase activity). The corresponding Rhea reactions are: RHEA:62016 and RHEA:58116, respectively.

@hdrabkin
Copy link
Contributor

hdrabkin commented May 8, 2020

@hattrill and @kaxelsen was waiting for the RHEAs to become public but now I"ve totally lost the point of this thread.
Is the request term xyloside xylosyltransferase activity suppose to be assigned to EC:2.4.2.42?
What RHEA should I use?

@kaxelsen
Copy link

kaxelsen commented May 8, 2020

Unfortunately my entries created Nov. 15 2019 have been stuck in the EC system until now, so they will only become public after having been in review, but this will happen soon, so they should become public in ~2 months. So I will soon be able to communicate the EC numbers.

@kaxelsen
Copy link

Now I have the EC numbers. I will list them in pathway order:
POGLUT1 EC 2.4.2.63 RHEA:62016 L-seryl-[EGF-like domain protein] + UDP-α-D-xylose = 3-O-(β-D-xylosyl)-L-seryl-[EGF-like domain protein] + H+ + UDP
POGLUT1 EC 2.4.1.376 RHEA:58116 L-seryl-[EGF-like domain protein] + UDP-α-D-glucose = 3-O-(β-D-glucosyl)-L-seryl-[EGF-like domain protein] + H+ + UDP
GXYLT2 EC 2.4.2.42 RHEA:56064 3-O-(β-D-glucosyl)-L-seryl-[EGF-like domain protein] + UDP-α-D-xylose = 3-O-[α-D-xylosyl-(1→3)-β-D-glucosyl]-L-seryl-[EGF-like domain protein] + H+ + UDP
XXYLT1 EC 2.4.2.62 RHEA:22820 3-O-[α-D-xylosyl-(1→3)-β-D-glucosyl]-L-seryl-[EGF-like domain protein] + UDP-α-D-xylose = 3-O-[α-D-xylosyl-(1→3)-α-D-xylosyl-(1→3)-β-D-glucosyl]-L-seryl-[EGF-like domain protein] + H+ + UDP

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Nov 11, 2020

Ready ?

@kaxelsen
Copy link

If you ask about the EC numbers, they became public just before June 23, and are now also in the UniProtKB

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Nov 25, 2020

@hattrill  this is the term you requested:

+[Term]
+id: GO:0140560
+name: xylosyl alpha-1,3-xylosyltransferase activity
+namespace: molecular_function
+def: "Catalyzes the reaction: UDP-alpha-D-xylose + [protein with EGF-like domain]-3-O-(alpha-D-xylosyl-(1->3)-beta-D-glucosyl)-L-serine <=> UDP + [protein with EGF-like domain]-3-O-(alpha-D-xylosyl-(1->3)-alpha-D-xylosyl-(1->3)-beta-D-glucosyl)-L-serine. The enzyme, found in animals and insects, is involved in the biosynthesis of the alpha-D-xylosyl-(1->3)-alpha-D-xylosyl-(1->3)- beta-D-glucosyl trisaccharide on epidermal growth factor-like (EGF- like) domains." [PMID:22117070, PMID:8982869, RHEA:22820]
+xref: EC:2.4.2.62
+xref: RHEA:22820
+is_a: GO:0016757 ! transferase activity, transferring glycosyl groups
+property_value: term_tracker_item #16869 xsd:anyURI
+created_by: pg
+creation_date: 2020-11-25T13:45:18Z

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Nov 25, 2020

@amorgat @kaxelsen

GXYLT2 EC:2.4.2.42 RHEA:56064

EC transferred to EC:2.4.1.17
GO already exists: GO:0015020 glucuronosyltransferase activity :)

However Rhea has reactions for both EC:2.4.1.17 (RHEA:21032) and EC 2.4.2.42 (RHEA:56064)

I guess we also need the two reactions in GO ? I dont understand why EC:2.4.1.17 was transferred.

Thanks, Pascale

@hattrill
Copy link
Author

Thanks @pgaudet

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Nov 25, 2020

Created other 2 terms recommended by @kaxelsen

+[Term]
+id: GO:0140561
+name: EGF-domain serine glucosyltransferase activity
+namespace: molecular_function
+def: "Catalysis of the reaction: UDP-alpha-D-glucose + [protein with EGF-like domain]-L-serine <=> UDP + [protein with EGF-like domain]-3-O-(beta-D-glucosyl)-L-serine." [RHEA:58116]
+xref: EC:2.4.1.376
+xref: RHEA:58116
+is_a: GO:0035251 ! UDP-glucosyltransferase activity
+property_value: term_tracker_item #16869 xsd:anyURI
+created_by: pg
+creation_date: 2020-11-25T14:19:23Z
+
+[Term]
+id: GO:0140562
+name: EGF-domain serine xylosyltransferase activity
+namespace: molecular_function
+def: "Catalyses the reaction: UDP-alpha-D-xylose + [protein with EGF-like domain]-L-serine <=> UDP + [protein with EGF-like domain]-3-O-(beta-D-xylosyl)-L-serine." [RHEA:62016]
+xref: EC 2.4.2.63
+xref: RHEA:62016
+is_a: GO:0035252 ! UDP-xylosyltransferase activity
+property_value: term_tracker_item #16869 xsd:anyURI
+created_by: pg
+creation_date: 2020-11-25T14:30:56Z

Thanks, Pascale

@pgaudet pgaudet assigned pgaudet and unassigned hdrabkin Nov 25, 2020
pgaudet added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 25, 2020
pgaudet added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 25, 2020
@kaxelsen
Copy link

kaxelsen commented Nov 25, 2020

@amorgat @kaxelsen

GXYLT2 EC:2.4.2.42 RHEA:56064

EC transferred to EC:2.4.1.17
GO already exists: GO:0015020 glucuronosyltransferase activity :)

However Rhea has reactions for both EC:2.4.1.17 (RHEA:21032) and EC 2.4.2.42 (RHEA:56064)

I guess we also need the two reactions in GO ? I dont understand why EC:2.4.1.17 was transferred.

Thanks, Pascale

I think you have looked at EC 2.4.1.42 (one) that has been transferred to EC 2.4.1.17.
EC 2.4.2.42 (two) is active and will remain so.
EC 2.4.1.17 has not been transferred.

@kaxelsen kaxelsen reopened this Nov 25, 2020
@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Nov 25, 2020

Thanks @kaxelsen !!!

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Nov 25, 2020

I will add 'UDP-D-xylose:beta-D-glucoside alpha-1,3-D-xylosyltransferase activity' (EC:2.4.2.42 /RHEA:56064) as a child of GO:0035252 UDP-xylosyltransferase activity, and move the reference PMID:30127001 (Two novel protein O-glucosyltransferases that modify sites distinct from POGLUT1 and affect Notch trafficking and signaling) to the new term.

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Nov 25, 2020

+[Term]
+id: GO:0140563
+name: UDP-D-xylose:beta-D-glucoside alpha-1,3-D-xylosyltransferase activity
+namespace: molecular_function
+def: "Catalyzes the reaction: UDP-alpha-D-xylose + [protein with EGF-like domain]-3-O-(beta-D-glucosyl)-L-serine <=> UDP + [protein with EGF-like domain]-3-O-(alpha-D-xylosyl-(1->3)-beta-D-glucosyl)-L-serine." [EC:2.4.2.42, PMID:30127001, RHEA:56064]
+xref: EC:2.4.2.42
+xref: RHEA:56064
+is_a: GO:0035252 ! UDP-xylosyltransferase activity
+property_value: term_tracker_item #16869 xsd:anyURI
+created_by: pg
+creation_date: 2020-11-25T16:07:58Z
+

pgaudet added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 25, 2020
@hdrabkin
Copy link
Contributor

Since rheas were added already I will remove tag

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants