Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revise definition of GO:0001540 amyloid-beta binding #20109

Closed
RLovering opened this issue Oct 12, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Revise definition of GO:0001540 amyloid-beta binding #20109

RLovering opened this issue Oct 12, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@RLovering
Copy link

RLovering commented Oct 12, 2020

Hi

please would you revise the definition for this term GO:0001540 amyloid-beta binding as the term name is misleading. Many proteins bind amyloid precursor protein or one of the cleavage products, and they are not all binding amyloid-beta. However, the current definition would suggest that any protein binding the precursor would be annotated to this term.

current definition:Interacting selectively and non-covalently with amyloid-beta peptide/protein and/or its precursor.

Change definition to:
Interacting selectively and non-covalently with amyloid-beta peptide/protein.

Thanks

Ruth
@pgarmiri @magrane @slaulederkind

@pgaudet pgaudet self-assigned this Oct 12, 2020
pgaudet added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 12, 2020
@slaulederkind
Copy link

And how about a amyloid-beta precursor binding term if the definition of term GO:0001540 "amyloid-beta binding" gets changed?

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Oct 12, 2020

@RLovering - what do you think ?

@RLovering
Copy link
Author

I think it is very odd that even though APP is a precursor of Amyloid-beta we haven't really assigned a MF term to the membrane protein. one of the cleavage products seems to be involved in transcription regulation (maybe as a coTF), the full proteins may act as an 'adhesion molecule' or signaling receptor. eg the uniprot record states: Functions as a cell surface receptor and performs physiological functions on the surface of neurons relevant to neurite growth, neuronal adhesion and axonogenesis.

APP has 2 paralogs APLP1 and APLP2 neither of which are given clear MF roles either.

So maybe it would be helpful to have a general term for binding these proteins, my problem is that because of their range of functions the term couldn't be included under anything other than protein binding.
I think it might be better to annotate the binding of these three proteins (APP, APLP1, APLP2) based on how they are functioning, eg when they acts as a coreceptor to coreceptor binding and to include APP in the with field.

Or can you see a better way to do this

Best

Ruth

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants