New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
resolve Rhea mapping for 'L-aminoadipate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase activity' GO:0004043 (NAD / NADP issue) #21639
Comments
I am not convinced that NADP is ever used as a cofactor as described in RHEA:12304 RHEA:12304 cites 3 Publications:
"The native protein is a monomer of 56.2 kDa that efficiently uses P6C (apparent Km 14 microM) and NAD+ (apparent Km 115 microM), but not NADP+ or other electron acceptors, as substrates. " @amorgat @kaxelsen Does the reaction described by RHEA:12304 exist? Thanks, Pascale |
@balhoff can we decide that no action is needed and the mappings are OK ? |
Wrong, in Table VI they show activity with NADP (it is almost as good as NAD) So RHEA:12304 does exist. It is also shown in PubMed=10320345 from LYS2_YEAST (P07702) |
Some additional information: |
How come then, P49419 is annotated to both Isn't this NAD(P)? |
Yes indeed, but as all the entries have been annotated as EC 1.2.1.31, they are annotated with both reactions linked to this EC number.
;-) |
I see. I thought UniProt was assigning RHEAs independent of ECs- looks like that's not the case |
We do, but we have not retrofitted all the existing annotations. So when we first changed from text reactions to Rhea reactions, we "just" switched all reactions. Anyway, the assignment of EC 1.2.1.31 to all these entries are wrong as EC 1.2.1.31 describes enzymes that can use both NADH and NADPH as electron carriers, and this is not the case for the current entries, they use NADH or NADPH. |
I see, thanks! |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: