Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix 'conjugation' branch #22916

Closed
3 tasks done
pgaudet opened this issue Feb 23, 2022 · 14 comments
Closed
3 tasks done

Fix 'conjugation' branch #22916

pgaudet opened this issue Feb 23, 2022 · 14 comments
Assignees

Comments

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Feb 23, 2022

  • GO:0000746 conjugation: obsolete: unnecessary and confusing grouping term
  • rehouse and redefine:
  • GO:0000747 'conjugation with cellular fusion'
  • GO:0000748 'conjugation with mutual genetic exchange'
  • GO:0009291 'unidirectional conjugation'
  • GO:0000762 pheromone-induced unidirectional conjugation
  • Also need to obsolete
  • GO:0046999 regulation of conjugation: 2 EXP dicty (fusion of cells of opposite mating types)
    • GO:0031135 negative regulation of conjugation 0 annotations
    • GO:0031136 positive regulation of conjugation 0 annotations
@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgaudet commented Feb 23, 2022

This addresses a remaining issue in #21459

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgaudet commented Feb 23, 2022

Dear all,

The proposal has been made to obsolete

  • GO:0046999 regulation of conjugation:
  • GO:0031135 negative regulation of conjugation 0 annotations
  • GO:0031136 positive regulation of conjugation 0 annotations

The reason for obsoletion is that 'conjugation' is a confusing grouping term, has been used inconsistently and so will be obsoleted. There are 2 EXP annotations to GO:0046999 by dictyBase. There are no mappings, these terms are not present in any subsets.

You can comment on the ticket:

#22916

Thanks, Pascale

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgaudet commented Feb 25, 2022

Dear all,

The proposal has been made to obsolete 'GO:0000762 pheromone-induced unidirectional conjugation'. The reason for obsoletion is that this term is a child of a term that describes bacterial conjugation but is defined as a eukaryote conjugation (ie it refers to different mating types). There are no references, no annotations, no mappings, this term is not in any subset.

You can comment on the ticket: #22916

Thanks, Pascale

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgaudet commented Feb 25, 2022

  • conjugation with mutual genetic exchange: add def xref: PMID:2244414
  • unidirectional conjugation: remove is_a conjugation

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgaudet commented Feb 25, 2022

In fact I found some references for 'GO:0000762 pheromone-induced unidirectional conjugation', so I'll add these and edit the definition to "The process of unidirectional (polarized) transfer of genetic information involving direct cellular contact between a donor and recipient cell; the contact is followed by the formation of a cellular bridge that physically connects the cells; some or all of the chromosome(s) of the donor cell is transferred into the recipient cell; unidirectional conjugation occurs between cells of different mating types." (ie remove 'male/female' in favor of donor/recipient)

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgaudet commented Feb 25, 2022

Dear all,

The proposal has been made to obsolete

  • GO:0000746 conjugation - 0 annotations
  • GO:0000767 cell morphogenesis involved in conjugation 1 EXP by SGD (consider the child term: GO:0000753
    cell morphogenesis involved in conjugation with cellular fusion)
  • GO:0000771 agglutination involved in conjugation - 0 annotations

The reason for obsoletion is that this term represents an unnecessary and confusing grouping class, as it is defined as "The union or introduction of genetic information from compatible mating types that results in a genetically different individual", but this is not the case for all existing children. Children have been rehoused and redefined (see comments in the ticket).

There are no mappings, these terms are not present in any subsets.

You can comment on the ticket: #22916

Thanks, Pascale

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgaudet commented Feb 25, 2022

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgaudet commented Feb 25, 2022

  • GO:0071832 peptide pheromone export involved in regulation of conjugation -> 0 annotations; merge into GO:0071835 mating pheromone secretion involved in regulation of conjugation with cellular fusion
  • GO:0071833 peptide pheromone export involved in positive regulation of conjugation -> 0 annotations; merge into GO:0071631 mating pheromone secretion involved in positive regulation of conjugation with cellular fusion

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgaudet commented Feb 25, 2022

In fact there were mappings to conjugation:

@marekskrzypek @srengel @nataled let me know if you want to do something different

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgaudet commented Feb 25, 2022

@Antonialock There is a KW mapping to conjugation, KW-0184

I dont think this can be remapped, as the KW describes both yeast and bacterial conjugation.

pgaudet added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2022
pgaudet added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2022
@Antonialock
Copy link

@pgaudet I removed the mapping and suggested the KW is used in a rule instead.

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgaudet commented Feb 28, 2022

Further changes during discussion in multiorg group
@dsiegele @mgiglio99 @genegodbold @nsuvarnaiari

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgaudet commented Feb 28, 2022

add synonym: "bacterial conjugation" RELATED

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgaudet commented Feb 28, 2022

GO:0000762 pheromone-induced unidirectional conjugation
Change def:
-def: "Unidirectional transfer of genetic information in response to a pheromone." [GOC:elh, PMID:17360276, PMID:27021562, PMID:31191478]
+def: "Unidirectional transfer of genetic information triggered by to a pheromone signal.

pgaudet added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2022
changes to genetic transfer fixes #22916 fixes #22952
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants