Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question on Revised D-glucosamine PTS permease activity, #27694

Closed
pgaudet opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Question on Revised D-glucosamine PTS permease activity, #27694

pgaudet opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Apr 23, 2024

Hi @raymond91125

For #27410 you updated GO:0103111 D-glucosamine PTS permease activity to narrowEC xref: [2.7.1.191] (https://enzyme.expasy.org/EC/2.7.1.191) (protein-N(pi)-phosphohistidine--D-mannose phosphotransferase)

How did you choose that one? Given that the previous EC matches many new ECs:
Transferred entry: 2.7.1.191
Transferred entry: 2.7.1.192
Transferred entry: 2.7.1.193
Transferred entry: 2.7.1.194
Transferred entry: 2.7.1.195,2.7.1.196
Transferred entry: 2.7.1.197
Transferred entry: 2.7.1.198
Transferred entry: 2.7.1.199
Transferred entry: 2.7.1.200
Transferred entry: 2.7.1.201,2.7.1.202
Transferred entry: 2.7.1.203
Transferred entry: 2.7.1.204
Transferred entry: 2.7.1.205
Transferred entry: 2.7.1.206
Transferred entry: 2.7.1.207
Transferred entry: 2.7.1.208

Also, the EC you picked corresponds to a RHEA that is different from the one we have a the GO term.

  • EC:2.7.1.191 is mapped by RHEA to RHEA:49232 D-mannose(out) + Nπ-phospho-L-histidyl-[protein] = D-mannose 6-phosphate(in) + L-histidyl-[protein]
  • GO:0103111 D-glucosamine PTS permease activity maps to RHEA:37359 (no EC mapped), in which glucosamine is a substrate, which seems more consistent with the GO term.

Can you confirm that this is the correct new EC mapping for this term?

@raymond91125
Copy link
Contributor

Because of MetaCyc https://www.biocyc.org/reaction?orgid=META&id=TRANS-RXN-167A.
RHEA:37539 is an XREF but it doesn't specify the protein being a PTS enzyme. Thus I am not sure if RHEA should be used to replace the definition.

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgaudet commented Apr 24, 2024

I'll put this on next Monday's agenda. I would like to understand how you selected MetaCyc as the source of truth here - and how that relates to the changes you've implemented.

Originally there were 3 xrefs:
xref: EC:2.7.1.69
xref: MetaCyc:TRANS-RXN-167A
xref: RHEA:37359

And you changed EC:2.7.1.69 to EC:2.7.1.191, and left the other two cross references.
Also, MetaCyc mentions mannose and the GO def mentions glucosamine.

MetaCyc has this comment: "Note that this reaction equation differs from the official Enzyme Commission reaction equation for this EC entry, which can be found here"

For reference, changes are here: d3b519b

Thanks, Pascale

raymond91125 added a commit that referenced this issue May 3, 2024
Revised term D-glucosamine PTS permease activity, fixes #27694.
GO-EC-RHEA xref maintenance automation moved this from To do to Done May 3, 2024
@raymond91125
Copy link
Contributor

EC 2.7.1.193, RHEA:49240

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants