You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While trying to understand changes I see in the snapshot stats, I noticed a discrepancy between snapshot and what I see in AmiGO/AmiGO-staging: for example for human, the stats say that there are 2696 more IPI annotations
<style type="text/css"></style>
CHANGES IN ANNOTATIONS BY MODEL ORGANISM AND EVIDENCE (ALL) THEN QUALIFIER
TAXON
ALL
EXP
IDA
IMP
IGI
IPI
IEP
IGC
RCA
IBA
IKR
IC
NAS
ND
TAS
HDA
HEP
HGI
HMP
ISA
ISM
ISO
ISS
IEA
colocalizes_with
contributes_to
not
NCBITaxon:9606|Homo sapiens
3539
-15
1102
145
26
2696
-4
0
1
-5
0
11
90
-2
246
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
158
-918
0
-1
-1
; however when I filter in AmiGO I see 220819 IPIs for human, and 222261 in staging , i.e. a difference of 1442, or about half of what the stats report.
Any explanation for this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @kltm
While trying to understand changes I see in the snapshot stats, I noticed a discrepancy between snapshot and what I see in AmiGO/AmiGO-staging: for example for human, the stats say that there are 2696 more IPI annotations
<style type="text/css"></style>
; however when I filter in AmiGO I see 220819 IPIs for human, and 222261 in staging , i.e. a difference of 1442, or about half of what the stats report.
Any explanation for this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: