snaphot stats and staging dont match

[pgaudet]

Hi @kltm

While trying to understand changes I see in the snapshot stats, I noticed a discrepancy between snapshot and what I see in AmiGO/AmiGO-staging: for example for human, the stats say that there are 2696 more IPI annotations

<style type="text/css"></style>

CHANGES IN ANNOTATIONS BY MODEL ORGANISM AND EVIDENCE (ALL) THEN QUALIFIER
TAXON	ALL	EXP	IDA	IMP	IGI	IPI	IEP	IGC	RCA	IBA	IKR	IC	NAS	ND	TAS	HDA	HEP	HGI	HMP	ISA	ISM	ISO	ISS	IEA	colocalizes_with	contributes_to	not
NCBITaxon:9606|Homo sapiens	3539	-15	1102	145	26	2696	-4	0	1	-5	0	11	90	-2	246	0	0	0	0	0	0	8	158	-918	0	-1	-1

; however when I filter in AmiGO I see 220819 IPIs for human, and 222261 in staging , i.e. a difference of 1442, or about half of what the stats report.

Any explanation for this?

[kltm]

@pgaudet Strictly speaking, the actual difference would be:
(313231) https://amigo.geneontology.org/amigo/search/annotation?q=*:*&fq=evidence_type:%22IPI%22&sfq=document_category:%22annotation%22
(314790) https://amigo-staging.geneontology.io/amigo/search/annotation?q=*:*&fq=evidence_type:%22IPI%22&sfq=document_category:%22annotation%22
or 1559 annotations overall, and, adding filters, a change of 1442 for just human.

Of that 1320 are related to IntAct.

[kltm]

To clarify: the stats (I believe) are working on 3-letter evidence codes, but AmiGO is going to be more "evidence term"-oriented, out-of-the-box.