app-admin/gam-server: Support building app-admin/gam-server with clang and update EAPI to 7 #13122
Conversation
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.76, Repoman-2.3.17 Signed-off-by: Peter Levine <plevine457@gmail.com>
In GCC, a void return statement in a function that doesn't return void returns 0 as a compatibilty measure for archaic K&R C. Reliance on such behavior causes failure with clang. Explicitly return the intended return variable which is initialized to 0. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/509696 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.76, Repoman-2.3.17 Signed-off-by: Peter Levine <plevine457@gmail.com>
Pull Request assignmentSubmitter: @Peter-Levine app-admin/gam-server: @gentoo/freedesktop Linked bugsBugs linked: 509696 In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide |
gentoo-bot
added
assigned
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2019-10-02 02:59 UTC Issues already there before the PR (double-check them): |
|
Hey, has there been any activity? The PR alike has been opened by me for almost 1 month and nobody taken a look at it. May someone be responsible to finally merge it in in order to cease failing builds with clang as a compiler? Thank you |
|
@dannftk They have been moving in the direction of removing fam altogether so they may decide not to update fam related ebuilds in the meantime. |
|
@Peter-Levine , they have been removing 'fam' too long, haven't they? Do you know who a supreme maintainer is? For you requested the PR last year in October, so far no response has been given, there is silence |
|
fam should be removed. Closing. |
gam-server package is old and outdated and should eventually be removed. But until it is, it might as well support being built with clang. And if so, its EAPI might as well be updated too.
Update to EAPI 7
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.76, Repoman-2.3.17
Signed-off-by: Peter Levine plevine457@gmail.com
Fix building with clang
In GCC, a void return statement in a function that doesn't return void
returns 0 as a compatibility measure for archaic K&R C. Reliance on such
behavior causes failure with clang. Explicitly return the intended
return variable which is initialized to 0.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/509696
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.76, Repoman-2.3.17
Signed-off-by: Peter Levine plevine457@gmail.com