New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
mail-client/bower: bump to version 0.11 #13143
Conversation
Pull Request assignmentSubmitter: @rseichter mail-client/bower: @rseichter, @gentoo/proxy-maint Linked bugsBugs linked: 696198 In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide |
Noo don't use |
I did not actually use |
There's something one of us isnt seeing here. To me, it looks like the old file gets deleted (check Manifest file) and new one isn't identical (like, DESCRIPTION changes and COMMON_DEPEND introduced). If this is truly the case, could you split the commit into two? Or is my Github view somehow messing it up... I only see one commit. |
I squashed two commits because I forgot to remove the "A" in DESCRIPTION in the first commit. I did not introduce COMMON_DEPEND in 0.11. GitHub just seems to be confused, presenting diffs between obsolete ebuild 0.9 and 0.11 instead of 0.10 and 0.11. Here is what $ diff bower-0.10.ebuild bower-0.11.ebuild
8c8
< DESCRIPTION="A curses terminal client for the Notmuch email system"
---
> DESCRIPTION="Curses terminal client for the Notmuch email system"
14c14
< KEYWORDS="amd64"
---
> KEYWORDS="~amd64" So, the only difference between 0.10 (stable) and 0.11 are KEYWORDS and the article "A" in the description. I don't see what I could do to de-confuse GitHub. |
Note that repoman ci generates and commits the Manifest file, but I really use it for automated All in all you want to do:
so in the end there will be 2 logical commits. |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/696198 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.76, Repoman-2.3.16 Signed-off-by: Ralph Seichter <gentoo@seichter.de>
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.76, Repoman-2.3.16 Signed-off-by: Ralph Seichter <gentoo@seichter.de>
Looks OK to me now, thanks for the pointers. In the future, I need to be more selective about when and when not to squash commits. |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2019-10-18 15:19 UTC Issues already there before the PR (double-check them): |
Thanks!
if you havent already, this should be reported to upstream. |
Upstream release 0.11.