dev-lang/erlang: introduce subslots #13780
Conversation
Pull Request assignmentSubmitter: @arkamar dev-erlang/ezlib: At least one of the listed packages is maintained entirely by non-GitHub developers! Linked bugsBugs linked: 661080, 692294, 700260, 661126 Missing Bugzilla accountsWARNING: The following maintainers do not match any Bugzilla accounts: Please either fix the e-mail addresses in metadata.xml or create a Bugzilla account, and request reassignment afterwards. In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide |
gentoo-bot
added
maintainer-needed
|
The changes look mostly ok. The motivation behind subslot for I suggest stating the subslot motivation right in the ebuild in comment.
AFAIU erlang does not perform such a code duplication and just uses bytecode (and maybe something else with
I suspect some form of |
|
Yes, I will look at it for sure. I just wanted to let you know that you can count with it. |
|
I found Support, Compatibility, Deprecations, and Removal document, where section 6.3 describes what we need. I believe those two points are most important:
I believe we should use The HiPE seems to be safe to use only with Well, some projects can start with User-Defined Boot Script and those relies on exact application versions in OTP, but it seems that we do not have any package with this in What do you think? |
Gentoo has no way to set programmatic |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.76, Repoman-2.3.16 Signed-off-by: Petr Vaněk <arkamar@atlas.cz>
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/661080 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/661126 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/692294 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/700260 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.76, Repoman-2.3.16 Signed-off-by: Petr Vaněk <arkamar@atlas.cz>
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/661080 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.76, Repoman-2.3.16 Signed-off-by: Petr Vaněk <arkamar@atlas.cz>
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/661126 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.76, Repoman-2.3.16 Signed-off-by: Petr Vaněk <arkamar@atlas.cz>
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/661126 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.76, Repoman-2.3.16 Signed-off-by: Petr Vaněk <arkamar@atlas.cz>
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/700260 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.76, Repoman-2.3.16 Signed-off-by: Petr Vaněk <arkamar@atlas.cz>
arkamar
force-pushed
the
erlang-subslot
branch
from
75993c5
to
0bf94fa
Compare
|
Done and rebased on top of current |
|
thanks! |
This PR introduces subslots in erlang and subscribes few packages to it.
I believe we should support subslots in erlang in similar fashion like
dev-lang/gofor example. I have chosen0/${PV}because time to time it happens that patch version fixes some bugs in compiler and therefore we want to recompile all erlang dependent packages.Well, I am not sure if this is a correct way how to introduce subslots to any package, but I did not find any satisfactory guidelines. Please, tell me what do you think.