dev-util/oprofile: Add fix for binutils 2.34 re bug #707850

[kentfredric]

This adds the patch attached on bug #707850, and adds the glue
required to make it work.

I've used java-pkg-opt-2_src_prepare as the "do this after patching"
because analysis of the environment file for this ebuild indicated
that's what src_prepare was already doing.

This may not be the best thing, but it works.

Repoman also warns about using 'user' instead of GLEP81, and I
have not fixed this, but somebody should.

Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/707850
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.97, Repoman-2.3.22
Signed-off-by: Kent Fredric kentnl@gentoo.org

Diff between 1.3.0.ebuild and 1.3.0-r1.ebuild:

--- oprofile-1.3.0.ebuild	2020-04-23 01:54:04.170617268 +1200
+++ oprofile-1.3.0-r1.ebuild	2020-04-23 02:02:55.610295125 +1200
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 
 LICENSE="GPL-2"
 SLOT="0"
-KEYWORDS="~alpha amd64 arm ~hppa ~mips ppc ppc64 ~sparc x86"
+KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~hppa ~mips ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc ~x86"
 IUSE="java pch"
 
 RDEPEND=">=dev-libs/popt-1.7-r1
@@ -38,6 +38,10 @@
 
 	use java && java-pkg_init
 }
+src_prepare() {
+	eapply "${FILESDIR}/${PN}-1.3.0-binutils-2.24.patch"
+	java-pkg-opt-2_src_prepare
+}
 
 src_configure() {
 	econf \

[gentoo-bot]

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @kentfredric
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: dev-util/oprofile

dev-util/oprofile: @bircoph

Linked bugs

Bugs linked: 707850

---

In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2020-04-22 16:29 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 6e5f2c8
Status: ❌ broken

New issues caused by PR:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c9cbc0f/output.html#dev-util/oprofile

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c9cbc0f/output.html

[kentfredric]

Report failure is just the "user" problem I mentioned earlier ( it makes the 'new' classification because of the addition of the -r1 ebuild increases the number of output lines ). Feel free to ignore.